Recent content by linux

Hey, Looks like with the changes to RRD, there is a new data upgrade process, and some partially-reverted changes. Is someone able to please publish the ds/cf values for the below variants, that would be great. pve2-{type} vs pve2.3-{type} vs pve-{type}-9.0 It seems pve2-{type} no longer...

Hi again, we've seen this fingerprint issue recur for the first time (in the last week) since it was fixed in PVE 8.0 (we run PMG this way). https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fingerprint-error.126816/#post-593864 (to show the history/changelog/etc we're talking about) Quite strange, as we'd...

Thanks for the clarity. We've since moved up to v8.1 and all is working nicely!

Your browser cache being stale/irrelevant sounds most likely. Odds are the content was expired by the time you revisited, so was re-fetched properly. Just a guess.

For what it's worth, I've just upgraded from 8.0.11 to 8.1.2 (GUI reflected version, PMG is 8.1.0) - and both hosts report OK! pmg-api (8.1.2) over (8.0.11) ... proxmox-mailgateway (8.1.0) over (8.0.1)... :)

Hi all, Just looking for views of SAS vs NVMe for guest storage in current times, to get an idea of what makes the most sense with a potential system build: This is the compatibility matrix we've been sent about the options. SAS 24G @ 15.36TB per drive seems wise to me. From there, another...

Ah hah, though what are your thoughts on my screenshots showing that even the GUI cannot discern some actions' success/error state? Thanks, this is the normal process for us. These power actions seem different, and there are enough discrepancies to query it further!

I'm working in PHP, not Bash? Using a class to fire API calls. JSON replies. Status makes sense and we use this already, but this is about determining whether a call failed to execute properly, even if syntactically OK. That's where it seems the UPID is returned regardless, but via JSON if we...

Hi there, Just comparing the attached realities of what is reflected for an OK action and then a not-OK action, there are a few things I'm curious about: Rather than just firing and hoping that if the request went through OK, that it is actually OK, we need to know the error/status. Comparing...

Thank you, however for 8.0 the latest installer is dated months before our latest update in late October. We haven't missed much. The update was done then intentionally to make sure we were ahead of 8.1 but equally up and away from 7.4. Timed up well.

Hi there, Just checking the best way to "pin" a Proxmox VE version before running an upgrade, so as to update to the latest "dot" releases of the previous sub-major. Now that v8.1 is released, we'd like to get everything up to latest v8.0 minor/patch - is this easily doable? I'd imagine so via...

Hi there, Looking at your forum in dark mode, it's gorgeous with the orange outlines used cleverly in a primary/secondary context against the black/dark. Whereas in the Proxmox software packages, this isn't the case - orange is hardly used. Could this be expanded in PVE 8.1? I would say that...

Thanks, that makes sense. Did this and removed it afterwards. Couldn't see any wraparound during any check-point. Both reboots went well, nothing to report. Thanks very much for your help with this, glad to know it's already covered. Thanks, have done that now...

I'd say this segment only could benefit from being more clear about legacy mode, as it currently sounds like it is OK (bug does not apply). https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_7_to_8#GRUB_Might_Fail_To_Boot_From_LVM_in_UEFI_Mode Thanks again for all of your work on this. 1 in 120-250...

Okay great, thanks for the additional clarity! Remove the grubtemp LV at which stage - after 1st reboot to PVE 7.4-latest? Then check vgscan before 2nd reboot? Also, did you see my comment about orange outlines on forum vs GUIs, and that the software would benefit from it?