Recent content by jf21

This thread was/is about the samsung 990 pro dropping out of the system (with the error message from the subject of the thread). If your system crashes then you probably have different logs/effects and you should probably open a different thread.

We didnt find any solution for the Samsung 990 Pro's problem - tried everything. They just seem to get dropped every ~30 days (most runtime we got). We ended up replacing all of them from our servers and use a different vendor. Interesstingly the issue itself seems to be firmware related to the...

Das stimmt so nicht. Ich habe auf den X13 Boards die Firmware der onboard 10G Broadcom NICs erfolgreich geflashed. Das geht problemlos mit dem niccli. Statt der uralten 216.x hat man dann die aktuellste 231.x drauf. Damit sind dann auch die Probleme bzgl. rdma/infiband erledigt. Hier auf einem...

I can confirm this issue with the samsung 990, both 2TB and 4TB models. Updating the firmware doesnt help. Btw, you dont need to boot the iso or use magician to update the firmware. Just download the firmware update iso and mount it: mount Samsung_SSD_990_PRO_4B2QJXD7.iso -o loop /mnt then...

Also having problems with the 6.8 update here, had to pin to 6.5. Hardware: Supermicro X13DEI-T Mellanox ConnectX-5 I am getting the following logs which seem to point to the broadcom driver for the mellanox card?: May 06 14:20:43 exegol kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 06...

@Taleya that means one of the checks of the plugins returns nil (empty) - which the plugin doesnt expect to happen. Basically the plugin would need to be fixed to handle that. I am not good at ruby so i dont feel like doing this. You could try to find out which of the checks returns nil by...

This plugin is great. Only thing i am missing is if it could check for backups and their age (i.e. if taken properly - timestamp is ok). I think the proxmox api supports this, so it maybe possible to add this feature?

Hello, sorry to resurrect this thread - but it appears that since then proxmox still doesnt support to migrate a VM with hostpci (SR-IOV) (network) devices. However there have been changes to libvirt - there is a option called teaming which sounds like a way to get this working. There is a...

Ok, i get that. Our use case is that we want to have data replicated to another site. If something goes wrong with siteA (initial site) then we still have data on SiteB. Now we do not want to touch that data (forensics) but would like to create clones for e.g. data recovery. Key is to not change...

Ok, thats what i feared. Well...are there plans to implent this or is this a too uncommon use-case (i am not a pro on ZFS so i am not sure if its technically possible)?

Well, this is how to reproduce: (Create cluster of SiteA and SiteB) SiteA: Create a VM1 with ZFS storage SiteA: Configure replication of VM disks of VM1 to SiteB SiteB: Create same VM with replicated disks now present SiteB: Convert VM to template (this changes disks from "vm-100-disk-0" to...

Just an update: after i recreate the template and the replication started again the base disks are gone. They are no longer on the ZFS but the template still references them. Now if you try to use the template to create a clone (full or linked) it will result in an error: TASK ERROR: clone...

Ok, ive deleted the template and recreated it. Now i can see the base disks and i can create a linked clone. However now it appears the replication is broken. The replication still replicates to vm1:vm-100-disk-0 while the base disk is vm1:base-100-disk-0. So the linked or full clones will...

I converted a VM to the template. Whats wrong with it?

(This is from the replication target, SiteB): zfspool: vm1 pool zpool1/vm1 content rootdir,images mountpoint /zpool1/vm1 sparse 1 and the VM to-be-cloned itself: agent: 1 boot: order=ide2;net0 cores: 3 ide2: none,media=cdrom memory: 15258 name: Server-Replicated net0...