Recent content by Hannes Laimer

Hey, can you SSH into the PVE host?

This sounds like the problem, it looks like only traffic for PVE is routed through the tunnel. Is the PVE host also on 192.168.0.0/24?

Hey, what does systemctl status pveproxy say? I assume you can SSH into it since you can ping it, could you post the output of ip a? Can you ping your router from PVE? And does ss -tulpn | grep 8006 output something?

Hey, can you ping the PVE host(from 192.168.7.0/24)? I assume the whole 192.168.0.0/24 network is routed through the tunnel, does communication between those two networks generally work? What handles the routing between those two network, your router, or is that done on the PVE host?

Hey, deletion happens over /config/ruledb/who/{ogroup}/objects/{id} [1]. You need the id of the object. [1] https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/api-viewer/index.html#/config/whitelist/objects/{id} edit: misread blacklist for whitelist [1]...

Hey, kannst du mal prüfen ob die Interfaces in ip a mit denen in /etc/network/interfaces zusammenpassen? Falls nicht wäre /etc/network/interfaces anzupassen. Bei updates kann es vorkommen, dass sich Interfacenamen ändern, das sollte zwar nicht passieren, kann aber vorkommen.

Hey, can you ping the PVE instance? Could you post the output of ip a and systemctl status pveproxy.service? The messages in the logs just mean your system probably made a time jump, the problem will correct itself since it's not too big of at difference. These messages are mostly cosmetic.

Hey, you can just add a .100 and .200 to the interface name in your /etc/network/interfaces. For reference you can take a look at [1], there are also some examples. [1] https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/vlan/vlan-interfaces.5.en.html

Hey, if by VE you mean virtual machine then sure. Considering the HW budget this won't be the most reliable system.

Hey, sounds like something that could make sense, there is already an open feature request for that on [1]. You can add yourself to the CC list, so you'll get notified if something changes. [1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2672

Hey, take a look at the Tracking Center[1], there you'll find information about all mails that were processed and why, or why not, they were accepted. [1] https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#pmg_tracking_center

root@pxb02:/mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0# ls -la ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4 Mar 26 14:52 vm das sollte nicht so sein, hast du da manuell mal was angelegt? Mit chown -R backup:backup /mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0/vm kannst du den "Owner" der Dateien/Verzeichnisse ändern, dann...

Ich meinte nicht so einen user, es geht darum wem die Dateien im Datastore Verzeichnis gehören uns als welcher user der backup Prozess auf diese zugreift. Kannst du ls -la unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local und /mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0/vm ausführen und die Ausgabe die posten.

Hey, Backups gehören dem user backup, dieser sollte also berechtigt sein unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local zu schreiben. Mit ls -la kannst du die Berechtigungen einfach überprüfen. Ist was unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local gemounted, oder ist das lokaler Speicher?

Hey, could you post the VM config(qm config <VMID>) and the output of ip a from inside the VM. How did the VM get its IP, is it statically assigned or do you have a DHCP handing out IPs?