The usual use of the zero-day term is for vulnerabilities that are being exploited while there is no fix yet (for a supported/current version). That is something the administrator cannot do much about. This vulnerability is probably already fixed...
In any case, I don't think this is a 0day vulnerability, because on this is happen due to out date servers and bad servers administration, to say the least.
Many of this vulnerabilities are well-know documented, such as kernel and ssh...
The Linux kernel has had at least 500 CVE's fixed per release (before LLMs) and your PVE 7 kernel (5.15?) is many version behind, so either one could potentially be the entry point. Whether you had a good password is irrelevant. Proxmox fixed...
PVE 7 and the Debian version it sits on went end of life over two (corrected from three) years ago. The list of vulnerabilities discovered and patched since then is going to be a mile long.
It would even be a bad idea to expose a fully patched...
Thank you for reminding people to regularly upgrade their software (and not run unsupported versions). I do hope you can recover from backups on a fresh (and supported) Proxmox.
There is a section in the PBS manual about ransomware...
In a PVE-cluster, there is no master node or something like that.
Just move all guests to the other nodes and power that node off. Wait a few minutes and if nothing explodes, move on with your reinstallation... ;)
I ran into the same warning after upgrading from PVE 8 to PVE 9 with Ceph Squid.
It looks like /etc/init.d/ceph is simply an obsolete conffile left behind by ceph-base:
# dpkg -S /etc/init.d/ceph
ceph-base: /etc/init.d/ceph
# dpkg-query -W...
Sending notifications for exceeding storage limits is not possible with the current PBS feature set, using external monitoring is the best way to achieve this [0].
FWIW there is some development work in adding protections for datastores running...
You could try needrestart: needrestart man page
By default, it runs in interactive mode, i.e. if you update from the CLI (apt update && apt full-upgrade), it tells you whether a reboot is necessary, lists all services that need to be restarted...
There is another old thread about that topic as well as bugzilla entry.
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/feature-request-proxmox-ve-scheduled-tasks.152468/
https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7539
You could only grant them access to manually execute shutdowns via the UI with VM.PowerMgmt perms on a pool or on individual guests.
For the scheduling you'd need to go outside PVE. Either drive the API directly with a token scoped to that same...
Virtual machine support is better classified first by CPU architecture rather than by the guest OS itself. At this point, the relevant architectures are x86 and ARM.
The next question is whether the guest OS supports the virtual hardware...
PVE doesn't have a 'supported' list, I am assuming this is a list of VMs you're wanting to export from an existing system like vSphere?
You can run essentially any x86-64 OS, so all of those are fine. The OS Type field in PVE isn't a...
I swapped the nics and it made a huge difference, I know mellanox is better, but damn.
Ceph Network Swapping Test Summary
Workload TypeMetricBefore (Old Public/Cluster Setup)After (ConnectX-5 for Cluster Network)Performance Impact...
There is now a newer pve-manager with version 9.2.12 available on the pve-test repo and a backport of that as 8.4.22 for PVE 8's pvetest repo, matching our respective test repo of the ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle releases.
There is some better...
This can be done gradually, but needs a bit of care. We're currently in the process of finishing a migration helper tool and providing documentation for how to do this.
I am on the Ceph users email list, and it seems the fix is not a simple update, and will not be trivial. You have to use new authentication keys, aes256k, and rotate the keys used, and for that (for rbd storage at least), shutdown all VMs. And...