Recent content by benitoll

It's already mainline (since yesterday). Of course it's long from being considered stable or even put in longterm support, but I am not thinking in the short term. And, may be, the feature could even be backported (just a thought).

Hi, I hope this is the right place. What's your planning on (Intel) virtual GPU support? it's already in mainline kernel (4.10). If you have no planning, at least a very approximate ETA? It would be awesome to be able to start taking advantage of the iGPUs on E3 Xeons.

Hello, the title describes the problem pretty well. It's a single node with no cluster or any "exotic" external storage. The problem has been happening for a while now, may be some months (we've learned just to not backup entire VMs and not to restart them unnecesarily, and never at heavy usage...

@Cerias thanks for the answer, but unfortunately that was not the problem. I couldn't even really fix it (even converting the image failed, and after filling some disk space inside the VM it "input/output error" crashed, so I think the disk image was somehow corrupt/faulty). I could save the...

Hello, I have this very same issue, filesystem is ZFS (VM on zvol and backup storage either the very same ZFS filesystem or NFS, there is sufficient space in both and always fail at exactly the same percentaje in every attempt). This is a serious problem for me right now because my dedicated...

Hey, if you mean the network to work, you have to ONLY configure the vMAC, and inside the container you configure it normally (/etc/network/interfaces for Debian-based, or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX for RHEL-based, though I haven't...

Thank you very much, would it be possible for it to autodetect the proper mountpoint? that would be awesome :)

Hi, I'm not very much into compiling and sources, so if this post is fundamentally wrong for some reason, sorry in advance. For example I sense that may be using "Ubuntu-4.2.0-14.16" sources along with "config-4.2.2-1-pve" would give me the exact results I want? (no compatibility issues, lack...

If anyone cares at all, it now works (don't know if already fixed while beta or if after final release, but it works).

Hi, after the little problem I had in an OVH server with the default IP assignment way for LXC containers in latest Proxmox, they gave me a working temporary (I hope it's) solution, that basically is to only create the NIC from the Proxmox GUI, and configure the IP addresses from within the...

Re: lxc CT "unable to parse ipv4 address/mask" with OVH's bridget networki gateway sc Hi, the temporary solution is good enough (besides the problem I describe below), but please consider allowing the parser to not deny such networking scheme. By the way, I'm not sure if I should open a new...

Re: lxc CT "unable to parse ipv4 address/mask" with OVH's bridget networki gateway sc I feel dumb now, I've not tried yet but seems logic. You should consider allowing the parser to process OVH-like networking scheme, and (somehow) more than one non-consecutive IP/CIDR on a single vNIC...