bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    You've already received good pointers on troubleshooting and should continue digging into the logs. That said, the above description is very worrisome... You had 10-node cluster where 8 of them were failing to start services. We don't have...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @choctaw, welcome to the forum. Did you save any command-line output from the time you were attempting the upgrade? Frankly, based on the iterations of troubleshooting you described, but without the corresponding command output, it is...
  • bbgeek17
    Here's a slight refinement to my live restore description above, after more time in the source. There are three different sizes at work. I had them blurred together. The guest read is whatever size the guest asks for. The fetch from PBS is...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @krisshurley , we covered behavior related to your findings in our KB article a while back: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-qcow-snapshots-on-lvm/#data-consistency-and-information-leak-risks One approach would be to wipe the...
  • bbgeek17
    Hey @abhijithiaaxin, welcome to the forum. Whether it is a single-DC deployment or a split-DC deployment, you generally want an odd number of nodes in your cluster. But, as others have pointed out, a split-DC installation requires three...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Enterprise iSCSI support in PVE with Like Like.
    It has been ready for years. A high-friction CLI/UX workflow is not the same thing as a system being "unusable" or "not production-grade." Thousands of enterprise nodes run multipath iSCSI in production every day—it just requires Linux systems...
  • bbgeek17
    Thanks for the tracker link @robertlukan . It also affects testing - cloning from the secondary is a common way to practice a recovery without touching replication. For the 50TB question, @alexskysilk'` math is the way to figure it. Two things...
  • bbgeek17
    Thanks, this is great detail. The command transcript especially. With krbd the snapshot mode should be fine since it doesn't need the journaling feature on the image. Journal mode is a different story though. There was a full patch series for...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @bbgeek17, In our context, we are preparing configurations intended to be instantiated by non-specialist departments; we are therefore prioritizing ease of implementation. 1. At the very beginning we followed multiple docs, mainly...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Rajan_Kumar.Jaiswal@sita. , welcome to the forum. Following @Francois Baillargeon suggestion, you may find some useful information here: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-tuning-low-latency-storage/ Blockbridge : Ultra low...
  • bbgeek17
    Thanks, @christophe! That's more configuration coverage than most reports we've found. "The multi-cluster equivalent of intra-cluster pvesr" is a good way to put it. Since you've run both modes in both directions, a few things you're in a rare...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi Everyone, Disaster recovery keeps coming up with folks moving off VMware, usually as some version of "what replaces SRM?" We've answered pieces of this in threads for years, so we finally sat down and wrote the whole thing up properly...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @xybo, yes that applies to ZFS as well! Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread VirtIO Block or IDE.
    Hi @Sisdyiyy , welcome to the forum. We have covered the performance comparison between the windows controllers in our KB here: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-optimizing-windows-server/part-4.html Hope it helps in your decision...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @powersupport , This topic has been discussed recently over here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/upgrade-from-proxmox-ve-8-4-x-to-9-1-veeam-related.185270/#post-862853 The answers to your questions are: 1, No 2. Not sure if older packages...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @grass127, We do have a lot of this data internally, but it isn't organized as methodically as the original tech note was, so it's hard to publish anything rigorous. What I can tell you is that the relative changes in performance are not...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @hishamrixs, welcome to the forum. While I understand, and often share, the sentiment expressed by other posters that different backup products might be better suited to your particular use case, we also have to recognize the business and...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread NVMe Over TCP - Proxmox VE.
    A few notes based on our experience with NVMe/TCP and PVE: Your performance expectation should come from your storage stack, not your choice of protocol. The transport is usually not the bottleneck in setups like this. If you're seeing latencies...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Howard A2 Labs , Perhaps if you provide your VM and Storage configuration and state, that may help others to zoom in on the issue. qm config [vmid] pvesm status pvesm list [storage] cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg Depending on the storage type...
  • bbgeek17
    Given your report that you have not found any IO related messages in "dmesg" and "journalctl" that is a pretty strong indication that the error is coming from a higher application layer. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage...