bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI storage configuration problem.Hi @kaushal_shah , welcome to the forum. You need to provide more information so that members can help. Start with: lsblk lsscsi cat /etc/PVE/storage.cfg pvesm status Also, review your journalctl output. Cheers. Blockbridge : Ultra low... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Support for snapshots with raw backing disk on thick LV.Hi @gplechuck , welcome to the forum. Technically, a qcow2 overlay can use a raw image as a backing file. PVE doesn't implement it that way for volume-chain snapshots. One of the pitfalls of of using RAW vs QCOW base is during creation of a...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox GUI Storage View Timeout (596) when listing VM Disks on NFS Storage.Hi @linuxxx3250 , welcome to the forum. Have you checked the journalctl and dmesg on the PVE host at the time of errors? In my experience not all NFS servers are created equal. Some struggle with directory listings when a lot of files are...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Security questions and contradictions.Hi @jan24, welcome to the forum. Today, a PVE cluster relies extensively on cross-node SSH communication via root account. While it primarily uses key-based authentication, password authentication is required in some situations, particularly...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread no iso options.Just fyi, PVE8 is less than 30 days from EOL- https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-support-lifecycle.35755/ The release notes for 8.4 state: Allow uploading and downloading disk images to storages with content type "Import", in...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread LVM shared FC storage - snapshot as a chain - status of storage API.Hi @rbremer , PBS does not take storage snapshots, perhaps you meant to use a different abbreviation here? Just clarifying this for the whole picture. Well, this API call is specifically marked as "do not use"...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Supported way to extend the PVE web UI for a third-party package?.You run the risk of breaking customer's GUI by introducing patches to the core software product that may conflict with future updates. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
Written back in 2016 ... I thought it was just a few years ago ... time flies. Thank you @bbgeek17 for digging this up.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Call for Feature: Native LINSTOR Support.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/drbdmanage-license-change.30404/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Resize Ubuntu VM disk.Your SDA is divided into 3 partitions (1,2,3) and there appears to be no LVM so pvresize does not apply. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Spanning Shared LVM over multiple PVs/LUNs from central storage appliance.The historical pitfall with this design is : splitting LUNs across SP A/SP B improves parallelism and queue depth, but if each SP is already running near its own capacity, a failure/trespass event on one SP means the survivor has to absorb both...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Bond interfaces.Hi @cbarbie , There is not enough information in your post - you did not explain what the failure is, not even the Layer its at. The best approach would be install tcpdump, if you don't have it yet, and trace each leg. Start with single...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread PANEL PROXMOX.Another vendor to take a look at is https://multiportal.io/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cannot migrate VM, because HA resource vm is not allowed.I don't know if it is a bug, adding some extra information may help others/staff: qm config 121 ha-manager status ha-manager rules list Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Backup of VM failed - disk image '/mnt/pve/.../images/.../vm-...-fleece-0.qcow2' already exists.You can also try: qm disk rescan [OPTIONS] Rescan all storages and update disk sizes and unused disk images. --dryrun <boolean> (default = 0) Do not actually write changes out to VM config(s). --vmid <integer>...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Veeam Backup issue: Proxmox VM backup failing.Hi @Chetna , welcome to the forum. The log snippet you posted is not nearly enough to suggest a meaningful troubleshooting direction. We do not know where the log originated, what associated task was running on PVE at the time, what initiated...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread What to mirror.This is a home setup; you are not running critical infrastructure. You already have a backup plan in place. If you want to experiment with a mirrored configuration, use a flexible option such as ZFS and configure it on your boot drives. If, a...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread What to mirror.Hi @starstrk , welcome to the forum. Keep in mind that disk Mirror is not a backup. It only protects you from a physical disk failure. Are all NVMe of the same type? Is one older than then others? Do they have different used percentage? You may...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread New to Proxmox.Hi @rkrick99 , welcome to the forum. Congratulations on embarking on a new technology journey. Your post is mostly hardware oriented but does not contain an explicit question. The hardware is certainly more than sufficient for a home experiment...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Windows Failover Cluster.For lab purposes you can achieve QCOW sharing by forcing QCOW disk assignment to two VMs via "qm set". However, this would be against both standard PVE practices and certainly against the MSFT cluster qualification, and as such - not suitable for...
