bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Failed to find logical volume vm-13649-disk-0 after reverting snapshot StarLVM plugin, FC storage.Great investigation @Gratified4693 and welcome to the forum. Have you tried to reach out to the provider of this plugin for support? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Re-IP'd Hosts to a new network ssh finds old IP's and won't connect between hosts.Great, you found the location where the errant IP is coming from. Remove this file and restart the services, or reboot the hosts: systemctl try-reload-or-restart pvedaemon pveproxy pvestatd pvescheduler pve-ha-lrm Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Connect Proxmox 9 to VMFS via iSCSI in read-only mode..Hi @FBFM, there is no official PVE method of mounting VMFS on a locally attached SAN LUN. There are several migration methods described here: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Migrate_to_Proxmox_VE , including an automatic import from running ESXi...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Re-IP'd Hosts to a new network ssh finds old IP's and won't connect between hosts.What is the context of "/etc/pve/.members" ? Have you "egrep -R old_ip /etc" ? I'd reboot both nodes again - at the same time. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Re-IP'd Hosts to a new network ssh finds old IP's and won't connect between hosts.Hi @Palathius, welcome to the forum It would be great if you mentioned more details on the steps you took to change PVE networking, in particular "tweaking". There is an orderly process to this, and it sounds like you may have missed a step...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread 2 Datacenters to 1.Hi Andygee1, Combining a VM-hosting node into existing cluster is not supported. You will need to clear out the node before joining it. There are still options to achieve your goal of merging the nodes and avoiding the loss of the config: -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox node get grayed out frequently.The gray question mark indicates that the daemon responsible for statistical and health updates was unable to talk to that node's software. It can also indicate that a subsystem on that node is not responding. The situation is often caused by...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Design question for LVM thick backend and HA for the VMs.Hi @Rappy , welcome to the forum. You have to distinguish two scenarios: a) you have two or more bare-bones vanilla Linux hosts where you map the same LUN, and use that LUN as if it was a local disk without any coordination b) you have cluster...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] NVME-of multipath inconsistency.Hi @Freddy Lege , We have seen no issues in our testing with PVE 9.2 and Kernel 7. Perhaps you can expand with more details, i.e.: - storage vendor you are using - exact PVE versions (pveversion / pveversion -v - how the connections were...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Entire cluster down when 1 of 5 is down.Hi @barndoor101, There is no reason for a single node outage to take out a 5 node healthy cluster. As such, there is no procedure to: You need to examine logs and system state of each surviving node in the cluster. There must be a secondary...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread One set of templates, multiple clusters.Yes, you'd need to create a VM config manually across the clusters. Note that sharing configuration and disks across clusters is not something that is officially supported, or tested. It should work with immutable type of VM such as a Template...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Fencing/failover for upstream and Ceph networks?.This topic has been brought up multiple times in the forum, but I do not recall if there was a good outcome, at this moment. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Fencing/failover for upstream and Ceph networks?.Hi @etfz , As far as I know there is no network or storage monitor integrated into default PVE cluster distribution. You will need to create your own. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Upgraded from 8.4 to 9.x - two main issues from webgui with
Like.
You can use Rescue Boot from the installation media and inspect the situation. https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pve-installation.html#installation_installer -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Best practices for updating and patching strategy (PVE + VMs, Ansible, snapshots).The unattended upgrades often lead to these types of posts in a forum: I had a power outage, all my host rebooted and now something is not working. I have not changed a thing! Oh there was a Kernel and QEMU and "something" upgrade a month ago...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox and iSCSI storage issues.This article may be of some help: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread One set of templates, multiple clusters.Hi @jtru , what are the exact issues are you trying to solve? Can you elaborate what are the remaining parts for you? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Upgraded from 8.4 to 9.x - two main issues from webgui.What about physical console? It's possible that you ran out of space. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Upgraded from 8.4 to 9.x - two main issues from webgui.Hi @Rice and Soy Sauce , Since you mentioned "some hiccups" it would have been great if you provided some information on what those were. Any log outputs from the upgrade time would help as well. In general, given potential upgrade issues, this...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Clone VM without changing the UUID?.You are welcome to file a feature request to overload GUI/CLI with this particular functionality. Given that you have options to achieve your goal already - be realistic about the priority of this request. The license providers may disagree with...