bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Upgrade PVE 8 to 9 but without kernel 7.0.If your current systems are working to your satisfaction, perhaps you should not rush into an upgrade. If you are upgrading to a new family of the hypervisor (8 to 9) be aware that the 9 is likely not explicitly tested with 6.x Kernel any more... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Promox inside Hyperv for testing API.You can/should change Proxmox to use a static IP and place it on such network in HyperV that allows it. There is also some discussion here, albeit it may be outdated...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Upgrade PVE 8 to 9 but without kernel 7.0.Hi @gkovacs , you can pin a specific Kernel version: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Host_Bootloader#sysboot_kernel_pin Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] One node cant access NAS shared storage.Great, you can mark the thread as solved by editing the first message and selecting the appropriate subject prefix. This will help others as they search the forum. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [nfs] how to use correct source address.Please share the context of the "/etc/pve/storage.cfg" Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Web gui not working after 8 to 9 upgrade.I'd pay attention to IP conflicts in your network - your symptoms can be explained by a transient duplicate IP. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread PVE9.2 Mount ISCSI.Hi @Jianming , also note that your backend storage may provide some level of thin provisioning at the SAN layer, independent of the iSCSI and LVM. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Clone VM without changing the UUID?.Hi @promxmox_user021 , welcome to the forum. I understand that you would prefer to have a built-in checkmark to address your needs. However, you have a very specific use-case, and I believe you can already address it with post-clone processing...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread [SOLVED] One node cant access NAS shared storage with
Like.
you see the problem now? -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] One node cant access NAS shared storage.The IO error indicates a basic Linux connectivity issue. Are you using Jumbo MTU? Are you sure there are no IP conflicts? Are there any errors on the network interface? Could this be a bad cable? A bad switch port? Start with the basics -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Wait until the SAN and LUNs are available before continuing with the Proxmox boot process.Another approach is to write a healthcheck/probe script that all the other PVE services will depend on. Once the probe determines that SAN is up - it lets the others to proceed. Or, the probe is independent and simply reboots the host when the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.You can use pvesm command : https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pvesm.1.html Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.Then it sounds like you dont need to disable it? The subdirs are created by PVE as needed based on "context" option. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.The storage.cfg is a globally shared file within a cluster. The configuration in this file must be valid for all nodes. The name of the storage pool is unique cluster-wide. dir: local disable path /var/lib/vz content...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.As you can see from the output you posted (next time you should use CODE tag </>), the storage with question mark (magnus) is allowed to be present on both nodes. However, most likely is not present on node2 - hence the ?. The "local" dir...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.What is the context of your /etc/pve/storage.cfg? does it contain "node" restriction by chance? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] No Web gui and random connection reset by peer.Hello @bubblegoose, welcome to the forum. There is one issue we should address first: the format of the data you provided is very difficult to read. Forum members, myself included, would greatly appreciate it if you could edit your post and use...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1 released! with Like.
We are pleased to announce the release of Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1! This point release focuses on expanding visibility and automation for large-scale, multi-site deployments. Our main focus for this iteration has been introducing...
-
I couldn't wait until tomorrow :). It is working now. Stupid mistake on my end. Thank you so much for getting me in the right place. I probably would have never gotten it. Much appreciated.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Noob with weird network issue.The system reported the above message, we have no reason to doubt this. If something changed since then - we have no evidence of it. An LACP bond that is misconfigured between two network nodes leads to an unpredictable behavior. Trying to...