bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Hi @alexinux , I think you are misunderstanding the mechanics of CIFS&NFS storage pool purpose in PVE. If we were to compare the PVE pool to your Server/Client infrastructure - PVE is the client. PVE does not serve storage but rather connects to...
  • bbgeek17
    Interesting paper, although by page 14 they ran out of information and decided to just duplicate PVE management document :-) Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread LVM and Proxmox.
    Hi @doma87 , Yes, LVM (thick) is the officially supported and safe method to allow for shared SAN storage in PVE Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @hahmed15 , welcome to the forum. You may want to get familiar with arguments expressed in this discussion: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-with-48-nodes.174684/ Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox and Veeam Backup.
    Veeam has a similar to PVE forum environment where you can get helpful Veeam specific advice. I am not trying to point fingers here. The message and the UUIDs are produced by Veeam. You are much more likely to get speedy help from a place...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox and Veeam Backup.
    I don't see any mention of Veeam relying on QEMU-guest-tools in their documentation. It seems the "guest processing" feature relies on being able to login into the VM and use the VM native capabilities. From my brief reading of the...
  • bbgeek17
    why are you necroing a 4 year old thread only to post an ad for your company?
  • bbgeek17
    AI thought it was a good idea... Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Most likely the erroneous entry was made at this time. It worked partially based on the last entered configuration until you needed the first part as well. Given that you found a solution to your issue, you should mark this thread as Solved by...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Technolust , welcome to the forum. Thank you for sharing this interesting observation. However, the default PVE installation does not come with lvm.conf containing two "devices{}" stanzas. Something happened to your file, most likely human...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Maiyannah , thank you for the update! It will certainly help others in the same situation. Your proposal to drop back to a untrusted certificate would be counterintuitive from a security standpoint. You've instructed the system to provide...
  • bbgeek17
    I understand. You should direct the email to mailbox/system that can process the emails, batch similar events and escalate based on defined counters. This is not something that a Hypervisor would excel at. There are companies that are dedicated...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @artye , welcome to the forum. This functionality is best implemented on the receiver side. If you are sending it to an alert system, the smart-ones usually have a rate limit. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to UdoB's post in the thread IBM Plugin with Like Like.
    Is there some documentation for that plugin? It should show details about the supported protocols and features, right?
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE exit codes meaning.
    Hi @TheAncientMariner , Exit code 1 is a generic non-success return value. Any non-zero exit code usually indicates a failure. Some applications use a range of exit codes to represent specific error conditions, but as far as I am aware, PVE...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox - VM io-error.
    Presumably you saw the IO error somewhere. You should post exactly what you saw and describe where (inside VM, in Hypervisor, elsewhere?). It could be a log snippet, a screenshot, anything that can help describe your situation. For all we know...
  • bbgeek17
    Great to hear! You can mark the thread as solved by editing the first post and selecting the appropriate subject prefix. That will help organize things for other readers in the future. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    @bbgeek17 thanks! You point at the right issue, and I had solved it a few minutes before you wrote ;-) I disabled the NFS-sharing and looked into the permissions on the NAS, for the CIFS-users there. The write-permission for our user...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @sgw, Having dealt with MultiProtocol access in prior life with multiple enterprise storage products I can tell you things are not simple there. Each vendor implements permissions mappings differently. Some store additional metadata in the...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @ebarrios08 , welcome to the forum. The error message is produced by Veeam, I would recommend starting with their support to help zoom in on a particular part of the process that failed. I don't know the compatibility requirements for...