bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] How to Configure Fibre Channel SAN Storage with Multipath and High Availability on Proxmox VE 9.LVM is a PVE integrated way to use FC as shared storage. You can read this article to get high level understanding of the components involved: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ Although it references iSCSI as... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread backup process tries to start a template resulting in an error.Thank you for the update @RobFantini! Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] How to Configure Fibre Channel SAN Storage with Multipath and High Availability on Proxmox VE 9.Hi @ProlyX , can you clarify "that" in your question? ZFS is not multi-initiator/multi-writer compatible. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread LVM vs LVM-Thin on Shared Fibre Channel LUN (3-Node Cluster) – Best Practice? with
Like.
Yes, lvm/thin is not cluster-aware so you will risk a loss of data. It's not supported for a reason, see also the table on https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage which clearly states that lvm/thin is NOT a shared storage. No for exactly the... -
@bbgeek17 wrote two pieces which should cover your questions: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-qcow-snapshots-on-lvm/ Basically snapshot on lvm/thick wasn't supported...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Installing multipath-tools-boot for iSCSI?.Hi @unsichtbarre , My guess is that the majority of people will never need this package, so there is no reason to create dependencies, or install it by default. Otherwise, it will be part of initramfs management on all installs. Blockbridge ...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] How to Configure Fibre Channel SAN Storage with Multipath and High Availability on Proxmox VE 9.The snapshot support sits above the FC/Multipath layers. It requires LVM to be placed on top of the Multipath device, as well as, snapshot-as-volume-chain 1 attributed on the storage pool. This attribute is present on the referenced page, however...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread loosing network connectivity after setup / update / reboot.Thank you for the update @Elleni . There could be many possibilities, for example: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/vms-loosing-network.180650/#post-838011 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Trouble with iSCSI and cluster node inconsistency.Thank you for the update @naps1saps . You can mark the thread as SOLVED by editing the first post and updating the subject prefix. Best of luck in your endeavors. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread loosing network connectivity after setup / update / reboot.Hi @Elleni, The first step is to go through standard Linux network troubleshooting. Capture the network state when everything is functioning correctly, then capture it again when the network is "broken". Compare the two states. Access the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread PVE-root is full.It will skip the mounted paths and it will not show the space occupied by the directory in pre-mounted state. One can make some inference regarding the space usage but the safest method is to unmount the external device and check again...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Trouble with iSCSI and cluster node inconsistency.What version of PVE are you running on each node? In PVE9 most of the database has moved to /var/lib/iscsi How are you managing iSCSI sessions? Are you using PVE storage pool or manual configuration? If former, is your cluster healthy? If later...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VMs loosing network.That's great news! Love it when root cause is found regardless of what it's! Thank you for the update! Cheers, Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VMs loosing network.Were windows Event logs checked? Can the VM ping/access another VM located within the same VLAN and same hypervisor? Perhaps you should have rolling network capture, or be prepared to start one at various points in the network (hypervisor...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VMs loosing network.Hi @Drunkm0nk , welcome to the forum. It does not seem probable that an upgrade of BIND9 package installed on a hypervisor would affect intermittent connectivity issue on random VMs. You have not provided nearly sufficient information to get...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Ansible/Terraform breaks on VLAN Interfaces.It does sound like an MTU issue. In addition to 28 byte IP header size, there is also a 4 byte VLAN header that may be playing a role here. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Issue with secondary local dir storage after node remove and add.Great, thanks for sharing. You can mark the thread as solved by editing the first post and selecting an appropriate subject prefix Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to Dale.Sykora's post in the thread [SOLVED] Issue with secondary local dir storage after node remove and add with Like.
I figured it out. There was a symlink missing under /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants for mnt-pve-dir1.mount Once this was created, dir1 shows up after a reboot.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Issue with secondary local dir storage after node remove and add.Then check why the disk is not mounted on boot, if indeed it is not mounted: journalctl -u mnt-pve-dir1.mount systemctl status mnt-pve-dir1.mount Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Issue with secondary local dir storage after node remove and add.You should check and match /etc/fstab from old nodes to new node. The filesystem will not be mounted by PVE, it has to be mounted already when PVE starts. If you are mounting through Systemd, you should check the log for any errors related to...