bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread unable to find configuration file for VM 220 on node 'pve-a'.The "qm" command only operates on local VMs. You are executing it from host A, you said the VM is on host C - the error is expected. You can run "qm list" to see what VMs you can access locally. You can run "pvecm status" to check the status of... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread unable to find configuration file for VM 220 on node 'pve-a'.Your timeout error is between your client and PVE machine. QM command only operates on VMs that are local to the host where you execute the QM. It seems like one of the hosts in your cluster is down. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread unable to find configuration file for VM 220 on node 'pve-a'.You are trying to stop VM 220, and then status check 221 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
I hope you mean you have a PBS VM on PVE- because as it looks you mean literally on the same Host bare metal! This would be bad!
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread PVE to PBS.Hi @BigBadBlack , welcome to the forum. You do not. It would be helpful if you provided actual information that you tried to input, errors you received, etc. If you are unable to provide accurate information in text format (please use CODE...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to FingerlessGloves's post in the thread LVM and snapshot-as-volume-chain with
Like.
Thanks for those useful links, I'll read those tomorrow, when I'm back in work :) -
bbgeek17 reacted to aaron's post in the thread Cluster two node active with shared storage in FC connection with Like.
Well, live migration should usually work always. With a non-shared storage it will also transfer the disks of the guests, and that can take a long time. So if you followed the multipath guide and still have some issues, the question would be...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread LVM and snapshot-as-volume-chain.yes, that is the correct type. Once you enable the Snapshot-as-volume-chain, the format will be QCOW on LVM. Keep in mind that this technology is in Preview mode. There is an associated performance impact to using QCOW whether on LVM or on top...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster two node active with shared storage in FC connection.To answer your question - NO, its not production feasible config. As @aaron pointed out, you need an odd number of servers in the cluster. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to aaron's post in the thread Cluster two node active with shared storage in FC connection with Like.
To add to @bbgeek17 check out the multipathing guide that also covers the finalization with a shared LVM on top: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Multipath And with just 2 nodes, you need to add a 3rd vote to the cluster, as otherwise if you...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster two node active with shared storage in FC connection.Hi @aflocco , welcome to the forum! You may want to read this article to give you a starting point: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage Follow your vendor's guide on attaching FC LUNs to Linux. Continue with vendor...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread auth.log 30 gb.When the file is open removing it does not always release the space immediately. A fast way to empty it is to echo "" > auth.log As @Gilou mentioned, you should take your server off the internet, block access to well known ports (22 in this case)...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread backup process tries to start a template resulting in an error.You can't start a template via user interfaces. Can you make sure that you are running the latest code? There were some issues around DBus that were fixed within the last month or so, if I recall correctly. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Add an additonal SCSI controller to a VM hardware like in VMware.You cannot add multiple SCSI controllers through the PVE UI. To do so, you will need to experiment with direct QEMU options via --args. I am not sure which UUID your SQL installation is bound to, as there are several possibilities. Most of these...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Web GUI Inaccessible to All but 1 Computer.You are very welcome. Happy you found an easy explanation. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.This is exactly the impression I was getting from the discussion as well. The OP wants a “simple” small-business solution that nonetheless delivers a fully featured, reliable DR setup with many characteristics typically associated with enterprise...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime? with Like.
I think you may be obsessing about the "performance" and "cost" aspects entirely too much. 1. What is the makeup of your payload? (number of vms, function, ACTUAL performance in IOPs) 2. a backup device MUST be a separate device then the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Add an additonal SCSI controller to a VM hardware like in VMware.That is an ESXi-dependent deployment, and it may not be something you can reproduce in PVE/QEMU. From a boot perspective, you only need a single disk. Additional disks may be required by the application itself, but the first step is to make the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Add an additonal SCSI controller to a VM hardware like in VMware.Hi @markosoftfl , welcome to the forum. I believe you need to switch to using Virtual SCSI Single controller. In this case a controller per disk will be created. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Web GUI Inaccessible to All but 1 Computer.It does sound very much like a duplicate IP issue. The logs are : journalctl -f You can also run tcpdump from the PVE console or SSH via "good" host to see what, if anything, happens to your "bad" connections: tcpdump -i physicalInterfaceHere -n...