bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    The UI is working, as in the service is running and is responding. As recommended previously, please research your network/router limitations. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    curl -k Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    The command you ran scans all suitable storage pools for orphan disks, so if you have an inoperable storage defined that would trip the command up. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    Have you checked the IP configuration of the hypervisor? Does vmbr0 indeed not have an interface attached? Compare the output of "ip a" and "cat /etc/network/interfaces" across the nodes. The error says that vmbr0 (which is a bridge) does not...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    Please repeat the curl command with https prefix. Its very likely that your switch/router is blocking access on non-standard ports. Make sure that PVE IP is not within the DHCP range of the router. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    Ich bin sicher, dass es möglich sein wird, sobald Broadcom dem letzten Kunden den letzten Cent abgenommen hat und den VMFS-Code schließlich als Open Source freigibt. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Alwin Antreich Good question. I’d expect both cache=direct and cache=writethrough to offer stronger consistency guarantees, but I’ll run some tests and report back. For what it’s worth, some of the confusion around cache=none stems from...
  • bbgeek17
    Sadly there are still many limits around file management in legacy storage products. Feel free to mark this thread solved by editing the first post and selecting solved from the dropdown near the subject. This will help keep the forum tidy...
  • bbgeek17
    I've discovered this is a limitation of Dell Powerscale (hard coded 4TiB file size limit)...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread NVMe over TCP support?.
    Hi @PmUserZFS , apologies about missing your question earlier. Seems like you found a way on your own! Our connection management is wrapped in the native storage Plugin, but at a high level its similar. Live Migration implies cluster, cluster...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to aaron's post in the thread Support Licenses with Like Like.
    To be even more pedantic, ;) the subscription, depending on the level, will give access to the enterprise repository. Which we definitely recommend for production environments. And then, depending on the level, can also include support tickets...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @greg.amos@capitolimagings, and welcome to the forum. The error you’re seeing is most likely related to a limitation on the NAS side. The final “no space left” message is essentially a catch-all response, it’s what the client receives when...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Kurgan, Your question reminded me of another advantage of LVM: its volatile metadata doesn't reside in a user-land address space, so a process kill can't put it into a state that leads to data loss. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @CS- , there was a recent conversation related to your request that you may find interesting: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/promox-design-dell-powerstore-pure-storage.166863/#post-820950 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Support Licenses.
    Hi @JDMcQ-IDS , welcome to the forum. The licensing questions are best discussed directly with Proxmox GmbG https://shop.proxmox.com/ , or with a partner in your region https://www.proxmox.com/en/partners/find-partner/explore AFAIK when/if the...
  • bbgeek17
    It may be worth filing a detailed bug/enhancement here https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ where it will get evaluated by developers and accepted/rejected. I would first confirm the behavior - create a test VM, attach ISO, take a snapshot...
  • bbgeek17
    You've asked the right person! We created a few performance oriented articles that may be useful: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-tuning-low-latency-storage https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-aio-vs-iouring...
  • bbgeek17
    Thank you for providing additional information. We will review and digest. We do not use either LVM or QCOW in our integration with PVE, so we have limited exposure with these technologies in some of our legacy customer environments. Our most...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @PatoGB , You don't need to change anything, the system will work just fine. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    If I am not mistaken, there is no "shared storage" concept with PDM. While you can migrate the VMs across two independent PVEs, that is achieved via remote-copy, not shared storage. Even ZFS replication, when managed by PVE, requires a cluster...