bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox Directory Documentation - Out of date?.A QCOW/VMDK/etc can be imported from any location. The "import disk" requires absolute path at this time. These are stored in "VM images". For historic reasons "VM Image" is a VM disk in PVE-speak. There is no GUI qcow import at this time... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox installation on Proliant BL460.What is the IP of your workstation? Can you ping the gateway? Can you ping the PVE server? Can you ssh into PVE server? What is the corresponding output from your workstation? (ipconfig /all ; ip a) What is the output of "curl -k...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox installation on Proliant BL460.Hi @arielcace , welcome to the forum. What does "ip a" show? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Server Suggestions.Most of the hardware complaints reported in the forum are by homelab users. A single-packet AMD server from any of the major vendors will do the job just fine. You will likely need at least two Compute servers with additional node for quorum. Or...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Server Suggestions.Hi @fanton , The server task suitability is not measured by who produced it. Any Enterprise server is generally suitable to run Linux. What you need to ask yourself: - how many virtual machines will I need? - how many virtual cores? - how much...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Optimize maintenance process ?.This is not something I'd recommend implementing in production/business environment. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread About Proxmox VE & PBS features.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-with-48-nodes.174684/#post-812003 Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread local-lvm issue adding node to cluster.@gtrovato , The short answer is "yes" - the fact that you are merging nodes into a single cluster that have different local-lvm definitions is what is causing the question marks. When you add a node to the cluster, there is a warning that any...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VMs are not responding during backups.@PwrBank , you are correct. This is why Backup Fleecing Storage was created. Prior to it, a write to a non-backed up segment was blocked until that segment could be backed up. If the backup link/storage/cpu are inadequate - it creates bottleneck...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Partitioning VMID space.Since you are already maintaining an external map of category=lower-upper, I'd try to avoid frequent cluster changes. The easiest way is to add another field in your map for last used, or next free. Another option is to generate next ID on the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread error VM qmp command failed - VM qmp command 'query-status' failed - unable to connect to VM 5021106 qmp socket - timeout after 51 retries.Hi @ssevasta , This is a free community support forum, so posting here does not open an official support case. For formal case tracking, you would need to have an active support subscription. That said, a staff member may still notice your post...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Verify and repair a potentially corrupted bridge (vmbr0) on a single node..Hi @dsintayehu , The first step would be to accompany your report with actual saved and running configuration output from "good" and "bad" notes. I.e. output of: - cat /etc/network/interfaces - ip a - ip route - brctl show - ping x.x.xx Add to...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Required SSH settings.Hi @SimonMcNair , you may also find this interesting: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-concurrent-vm-migration/index.html In the meantime, you can run: cat /etc/ssh/sshd_config|grep -vE "^#|$^" This will allow you to easily compare...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9 LVM snapshot feature still tech preview?.Hi @hambuergaer , you may need to wait until 9.1 release. So keep an eye on the front-page of the forum, major releases are generally announced there. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread A suggestion to add a couple of options to the GUI ..In the meantime, you can, relatively easily, do this via CLI/API. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE - shared storage type.Hi @CS- , It is my understanding that it is still in tech-preview. I suspect you'd need to wait for at least 9.1 release. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Suggestions for low cost HA production setup in small company.One can certainly buy a non-redundant DiskStation on Amazon; however, I’m not sure why that would be the starting point for a business-grade SAN solution. A highly available SAN should be considered the bare minimum in this context. Op...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread 2 Host Cluster with SAN.Hello @MikaSup , welcome to the forum. We'd need to know more about your exact VM and rules configuration. As well as how you reboot the node. In general, this is a good source for understanding the behavior ...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Restoring from backup removes existing snapshots.Interestingly there is already a message about snapshots: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/need-to-backup-broken-proxmox-without-ethernet.174832/#post-812476:~:text=INFO%3A%20snapshots%20found%20(not%20included%20into%20backup) :-)...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Need to backup broken Proxmox without ethernet.You will likely need to rename the volume group of the old disk so that there is no conflict, then you'd add a new storage pool that points to the renamed VG. You'd then restore you VM configs , then rescan for disks "qm disk rescan". The disks...