Latest activity
-
FFrancisS replied to the thread Need to restart VM with passthrough that crash..Hello Elias Thank you ! I try this Similar to this: ha-manager rules add node-affinity usb-vm-rule --resources vm:<VMID> --nodes <node-name> --strict I restarted the node, go to maintenance, all the other VMs are migrated and nothing. For the...
-
OOnslow reacted to cupidonihack's post in the thread Intermittent multi-second ZFS I/O latency on 4x Crucial BX500 RAIDZ1 – SMART clean, latency changes between drives with
Like.
Thank you very much for your answer. You have honestly saved me a huge amount of time. I was starting to go in circles with SATA ports, cables and individual drives, while the real issue was much more fundamental. I really appreciate you... -
OOnslow reacted to leesteken's post in the thread Intermittent multi-second ZFS I/O latency on 4x Crucial BX500 RAIDZ1 – SMART clean, latency changes between drives with Like.
BX500 has QLC and it need to flush it's SLC cache to it. And it cannot cache sync writes. Also, RAIDz1 has low IOPS compared to a ZFS mirror and is not good for VM/CTs. QLC and RAIDz1 and BX500 have been discussed on this forum so many times that...
-
j.theisen replied to the thread Hash Sum mismatch in no-subscription repo.Just checked the package from that mirror and on my end it also matches the Packages file. Could you please try again on your machine? -
JJohannes S reacted to proxuser77's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
I mean, the best hosting option varies depending on the use case, but yes, shared hosting providers are still a good option for hosting applications like WordPress or basic PHP applications. However, and I don’t know Uberspace, but in my...
-
JJohannes S reacted to proxuser77's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Yep, I wouldn't exactly call myself an expert, but I know how it works, and I even use cloud-init images on my Proxmox hosts to set up new VMs. My comments were just meant as examples to show that it’s normal with basic VPSs and dedicated servers...
-
EliasHuhsovitz replied to the thread Need to restart VM with passthrough that crash..Hello, Per-VM policy Patch There is a patch that hasn't been applied: v2 version v1 version This is the only mention of a feature like this on the mailing, that i am aware of. But it wouldn't be a permanent per-VM shutdown policy, like you... -
Iinfoplus posted the thread Dell PowerVault ME5024 iSCSI Performance: High Latency Spikes and Low Sequential Throughput on PVE 9 in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi everyone, I am experiencing severe latency spikes and sub-optimal bandwidth when running sequential read workloads over iSCSI from a Proxmox VE node to a Dell PowerVault ME5024 array. During high I/O tests on Proxmox, the average throughput...
-
Ddelltech1 replied to the thread [PROJECT] BASTRIX SharedLVM for Proxmox VE 9 — FC/iSCSI Storage with Thin Pools, Thick Generations and Multipath Safety.Yes, exactly. :) ZFS/Btrfs would be a different architectural model, since they already provide their own CoW and snapshot semantics, so trying to layer this approach on top would mostly defeat the purpose. NVMe-oF is much more interesting...
-
GG0ldmember replied to the thread Hash Sum mismatch in no-subscription repo.Hi, it's download.proxmox.com is an alias for download.cdn.proxmox.com. download.cdn.proxmox.com is an alias for de.eu.cdn.proxmox.com. de.eu.cdn.proxmox.com is an alias for de.cdn.proxmox.com. de.cdn.proxmox.com has address 212.224.123.70...
-
G_gabriel replied to the thread Bad Windows network performance - how to improve?.are, during the test, running the same among of VMs , vCPUs , load ? Check if power profile in BIOS is set to Max instead sometimes default balanced power.
-
j.theisen replied to the thread Hash Sum mismatch in no-subscription repo.Hi @G0ldmember thanks for reporting this! Tested on my end but here the checksums match. What CDN host does your PVE node use to download and does the issue persist? host download.proxmox.com Best regards Jonas
-
WWim.kra posted the thread PowerScale OneFS 9.12 (VM) in Proxmox in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi, is it possible to implement PowerScale OneFS 9.12 in Proxmox VM?
-
mira replied to the thread Problem with MegaRAID SAS3508 controller.Thank you for testing it! Since nobody else mentioned further issues, it should be stable (and as such was released to the enterprise repository). Still, if you notice anything off, please let us know. -
LnxBil replied to the thread Proxmox in enterprice environments with shared fc storage.You mean in a stripped setup? Yes, I agree. In a filesystem, you have this too, but don't see it (see next answer) As someone who has worked with both of them in the past, I can say that they have a lot of drawbacks, one is performance (which... -
@uzumo : seems you are right! The new 7.0.14-15-pve kernel with the mentioned fix appeared in the enterprise repository this morning. We're currently running it on one of our impacted production servers after some initial tests looked promising.
-
mira replied to the thread Proxmox 9 CPU/IO starved when doing a restore from PBS.To clarify: The patches mentioned by @fabian fix an issue where restores from PBS/VMA to ZFS can cause increased IO latencies on other ZFS-backed VMs during page writeback. The patches are included in pve-qemu-kvm 11.0.3-3 and qemu-server 9.2.7...
-
TTheBigOne posted the thread Proxmox in enterprice environments with shared fc storage in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I'm curious why there's no native support for traditional cluster filesystems like GFS2 or OCFS2. I fully get why Ceph is essential in hyper-converged setups, but it's impractical for synchronously replicated FC storage. It would bring IO...
-
Ccyp reacted to Galaxis's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
Haven't seen it mentioned in the kernel package Changelog, but the block device statistics regression indeed seems to be solved with 7.0.14-15-pve, at least on the system I tested it on for the past couple of days. Thanks!
-
Pproxuser77 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth.Yep, I wouldn't exactly call myself an expert, but I know how it works, and I even use cloud-init images on my Proxmox hosts to set up new VMs. My comments were just meant as examples to show that it’s normal with basic VPSs and dedicated servers...