Latest activity
-
Dd0glesby replied to the thread Kernel 7.0.14-14-pve: immediate reset + CPU machine check when igb loads on I350 (Dell XC730xd) — 6.14 unaffected.I'm also running PVE 9 with the 7.0 kernels on Dell R720, R720xd, R730, R730xd, R740, R750 systems. I've not seen this behaviour. I'd have to check and see what the mix of network interfaces are across all the systems, but it's a mix of onboard...
-
EErnst T. reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with
Like.
Yes, my view is indeed quite limited: The Internet would be in a better state if people would not run EOL systems on it. But you are missing my actual point: It's pointless to clean an infected system since you might have missed an unknown... -
Nns33 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox announces global 24/7 enterprise support and launches Proxmox North America Inc. with Like.
We are pleased to share two major milestones that will help us better serve our customers and partners worldwide. Global 24/7 enterprise support Starting October 19, 2026, Proxmox Enterprise Support will be available around the clock, 365 days a...
-
UdoB reacted to patpat0's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Purely theoretically, we don't know how long this bug has been exploited since it was possible to do anything, including clearing logs. Only now have script kiddies gotten their hands on it. -
UdoB reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Obviously this is possible, since anyone can compile the kernel as he sees fit. However, I do not believe that Proxmox VE or their community needs to invest time nor resources to maintain (extreme) EOL systems. I also believe Johannes S is...
-
Ppatpat0 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth.Purely theoretically, we don't know how long this bug has been exploited since it was possible to do anything, including clearing logs. Only now have script kiddies gotten their hands on it.
-
Jjtru reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with Like.
There is now a newer pve-manager with version 9.2.12 available on the pve-test repo and a backport of that as 8.4.22 for PVE 8's pvetest repo, matching our respective test repo of the ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle releases. There is some better...
-
Sspschumacher replied to the thread Creating snippets using PVE API.Same here... @ Proxmox Team: Is the ability to create or remove snippets on the roadmap?
-
Ssakrizz replied to the thread VM becomes unresponsive during Veeam backup.Rolled back the changes on Veeam settings, now I am running CEPH as backup cache on Veeam - default option (largest storage available). Performance got even better after the changes, roughly 150MB/s - 400 MB/s when testing it out while backup...
-
-
JJohannes S reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Obviously this is possible, since anyone can compile the kernel as he sees fit. However, I do not believe that Proxmox VE or their community needs to invest time nor resources to maintain (extreme) EOL systems. I also believe Johannes S is...
-
Ggfngfn256 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth.Obviously this is possible, since anyone can compile the kernel as he sees fit. However, I do not believe that Proxmox VE or their community needs to invest time nor resources to maintain (extreme) EOL systems. I also believe Johannes S is...
-
UdoB replied to the thread New router, PVE host can't connect to network at all.I don't know the specific reason. But basically: (PCI-bus)- interface names are not stable. They may mutate on hardware changes and on the advent of new kernel modules. That's why "pinning" was introduced...
-
UdoB reacted to siren4161's post in the thread New router, PVE host can't connect to network at all with Like.
Oh gosh, I've found the error. My interface is actually eno2 but /etc/network/interfaces had eno1. It's working now. Thanks, all. I'd like to learn something here. Why would my interface name change in the process of carrying my host PC from one...
-
UdoB reacted to leesteken's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 7.4-3 crash issue with Like.
The idea of backups is to make then before problems happen. If you want someone else to read and summarize the forum about similar issues, I would suggest a ChatBot/LLM or paying someone for support. The volunteers might want to spend their free...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 7.4-3 crash issue with Like.
You shouldn't just "consider" it except you enjoy getting hacked due to unpatched security issues: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-7-is-vulnerable-to-some-type-of-0day-rce-non-auth.186078/ If you are not able to keep you production...
-
Yyangsm replied to the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future.Where can I find the documentation for this migration tool? I cannot locate the usage instructions.
-
yep, I tried etckeeper today with Proxmox 9 and ran into a problem. I found this thread and saw that @mac.linux.free successfully solved the problem, so I asked him "how exactly" ;) BTW, I solved it too: 1. Update the...
-
HHeracleos reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with Like.
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only. Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64...
-
Si have a R730XD, latest Proxmox run without issues, what is the problem with the DL380?????
-
Ssalmonhomelab replied to the thread HPE DL380 GEN9.I solved the issue, I had a separate OS on it prior to this and a few configs were changed for that OS and it was preventing it from installing proxmox.
