The point- you dont NEED pve to achieve your desired functionality, and USING pve for it involves uncomfortable compromises with user experience. But you do you :)
If it were me, and you havent yet purchased anything- I'd buy two machines- one...
@n.frey Thank you. That helps a lot.
I'll admit that I struggle a bit with the permissions documentation. It makes sense, but I've realized it's one of those things that I only get good at by doing, and I don't have reason to mess around with...
I tried reinstalling it in PVE using the 265k.
It appears that the audio is playing fine via HDMI.
Package List
proxmox-ve: 9.2.0 (running kernel: 7.0.14-14-pve)
pve-manager: 9.2.11 (running version: 9.2.11/f6997e698c7933ea)...
The point- you dont NEED pve to achieve your desired functionality, and USING pve for it involves uncomfortable compromises with user experience. But you do you :)
If it were me, and you havent yet purchased anything- I'd buy two machines- one...
See our documentation [0] for the roles and their use-cases, i.e.:
So the PVEAdmin user has admin, user and audit privileges on all privilege groups, but is missing root privileges. For the Sys group, the root privs are:
root => [...
Ref: https://pdm.proxmox.com/docs/roadmap.html
I didn't see anything in the documentation or the roadmap regarding this, but it's Monday so my reading comprehension might not be at its best.
I have a single interface (nic0) on my default PDM...
the BRAND doesnt exist. The product line successors certainly do, and they were ALWAYS expensive in relations to the cost of "raw disk." If your RTO policies allow for a spof in your storage, I'm sure the ubiquiti nas will work. Having said that...
The main reason I want to use Proxmox isn't just to run a few VMs. I want to use the same machine as both my daily workstation and an independent homelab/server.
If I use Ubuntu as the host and run everything through KVM/QEMU, my daily desktop...
Yes, it can work. But it increases complexity. Drastically, from my point of view.
Perhaps the "Dev workstation"-concept may be interesting for you?
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Workstations_with_Proxmox_VE_and_X11...
Yes, it can work. But it increases complexity. Drastically, from my point of view.
Perhaps the "Dev workstation"-concept may be interesting for you?
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Workstations_with_Proxmox_VE_and_X11...
I accidentally deleted the disk from the virtual machine I was testing a moment ago, so please give me a moment.
On the N100 I use separately, Windows 11 works with HDMI audio using the same procedure, and since the display is the same, I think...
works fine in KVM.
LXC is possible, but it runs better in KVM as it needs some Kernel Access for routing, which KVM is able to provide, LXC not.
If you have a lot of VLAN's, the /etc/config/firewall file gets messy.
Our update mirrors (enterprise.proxmox.com, download.proxmox.com) are behind a global CDN (DNS-based distribution) - just see what:
enterprise.proxmox.com resolvs to on your machine and add that as allowed destintation (port 80 and 443)...
crazy idea- given your use case, why not start with a normal Windows/Linux desktop and run the rest of the vms in qemu? PVE isnt even desirable in your use case...
Why? ProxmoxVE is not designed around this usecase. A workstation setup like the one linked by UdoB is mainly for people who want to contribute to ProxmoxVE development. If this isn't your usecase using your favorite distribution as daily driver...
Yes, it can work. But it increases complexity. Drastically, from my point of view.
Perhaps the "Dev workstation"-concept may be interesting for you?
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Workstations_with_Proxmox_VE_and_X11...
crazy idea- given your use case, why not start with a normal Windows/Linux desktop and run the rest of the vms in qemu? PVE isnt even desirable in your use case...