Latest activity
-
TTom8 replied to the thread S3 chunk lock files accumulate indefinitely in tmpfs causing memory exhaustion.Hi all, currently I'm running Proxmox Backup-Server 4.2.5 with production ready enterprise subscription on Ugreen NAS DXP6800Pro * 12 Core i5 CPU * 8GB RAM (I know quiet less) * 2x 1TB Samsung 990Pro NVMe SSD (50GB for ZFS root, 2nd unused NVMe...
-
Uuzumo replied to the thread non-free-firmware install tries to remove kernel.Can't we just use what we already have? Since `firmware-netxen` overwrites `pve-firmware`, I believe it is attempting to uninstall anything related to `pve-firmware`. root@pve1:/home/admin# sudo modinfo netxen_nic filename...
-
Aantprox posted the thread non-free-firmware install tries to remove kernel in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I am trying to install firmware-netxen to get my HP NC375T NIC working on version 9 but it tries to uninstall proxmox-default-kernel, proxmox-kernel-7.0, proxmox-ve and pve-firmware. Any thoughts on how I can get the NetXen NX3031 chipset to...
-
Nnagi603 reacted to wolfgang's post in the thread How do I remove Replication jobs from missing node? with
Like.
You have to clean up manually. destroy the dataset manually and remove the jobs from the /etc/pve/replication.cfg -
Nnagi603 reacted to mu5h3r's post in the thread Very frequent AppArmor logs after updating PVE with Like.
In my case, setting up AppArmor inside containers helped. pct enter <id> echo "/run/systemd/journal/dev-log rw," >> /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.rsyslogd apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.rsyslogd reboot This is probably what fiona...
-
OOnslow reacted to huganega's post in the thread Proxmox VE 9.2 – sporadic iSCSI NOP timeouts / DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED with Dell PowerVault ME5 and Intel E810 with Like.
Hi Tmanok, Thanks for pointing me towards the newer E810 NVM firmware. I checked the adapters more closely and there is one important detail: these are HPE OEM Intel E810-XXVDA2 adapters, not Intel retail adapters. Both adapters were running...
-
OOnslow replied to the thread [SOLVED] [Virtualizing PDM] Host PVE Node Uses ZFS Storage. When installing PDM inside VM, EXT4 or ZFS?.Hi, I have read this paragraph a few times and still can't understand which fs it is about ;-(. Ext4 compared to ext4? Maybe you meant other fs than ext4 in the first sentence ("ext4 has the benefit") or maybe you meant other fs than ext4 in the...
-
OOnslow reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] [Virtualizing PDM] Host PVE Node Uses ZFS Storage. When installing PDM inside VM, EXT4 or ZFS? with Like.
It really depends on the usecase. For example for OPNsense ( see https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=44159.0 by meyergru ) it makes sense to use zfs inside the vm to have snapshots and due to the relative low write amount of opnsense the...
-
DDeQuzzie reacted to uzumo's post in the thread ZFS dedup on a Proxmox host in 2026 — has fast dedup changed the recommendation? with Like.
You can still use `block_cloning`, but since it’s extremely dangerous without `FIDEDUPERANGE`, I’m just waiting for now. The program below was developed by Mic92 during the discussion in #18745. It’s designed to work with `FIDEDUPERANGE` on ZFS...
-
DDeQuzzie reacted to Kingneutron's post in the thread ZFS dedup on a Proxmox host in 2026 — has fast dedup changed the recommendation? with Like.
> zpool status -D and the recordsize of the deduped datasets zpool list $zp; zfs list $zp NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zshelf15 47.5T 19.7T 27.8T - - 0% 41%...
-
DDeQuzzie replied to the thread ZFS dedup on a Proxmox host in 2026 — has fast dedup changed the recommendation?.@Kingneutron thanks for going back and checking — retracting your own number in public is rarer than it should be. Your figures are the most useful thing in the thread right now, because they answer what I asked in #25 and they match neither...
-
UdoB replied to the thread [SOLVED] [Virtualizing PDM] Host PVE Node Uses ZFS Storage. When installing PDM inside VM, EXT4 or ZFS?.Yeah, that's fine as long it is useful inside of the VM For pure testing it it fine - as there are definitely other rules than for a productive system. I am sure you know the recommendation to pass-through a controller for this, before going... -
Ggfngfn256 replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)!.With a total of 2GB of RAM, & ~0.6GB actually available, I'm not exactly sure what you intend to "run" on it! Possibly this was just a POC, but anyway happy Proxmoxing!
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] [Virtualizing PDM] Host PVE Node Uses ZFS Storage. When installing PDM inside VM, EXT4 or ZFS? with Like.
It really depends on the usecase. For example for OPNsense ( see https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=44159.0 by meyergru ) it makes sense to use zfs inside the vm to have snapshots and due to the relative low write amount of opnsense the...
-
This is not possible with Hetzner storage box though If I recall correctly. It might be possible to limit it to a hetzner vserver but then the vserver costs outweighs the price benefit of the storage box. Using storage boxes ( or any other...
-
news reacted to ostseereiter1's post in the thread Unterstützung für Proxmox VE 8 endet am 2026-08-31 with Like.
Alles super durchgelaufen bin jetzt auf Virtual Environment 9.2.11 alle VMs laufen bis jetzt bin erleichert. Danke an alle. Gruß OSR -
news reacted to Falk R.'s post in the thread Unterstützung für Proxmox VE 8 endet am 2026-08-31 with Like.
Ich upgrade regelmäßig PVE in Unternehmen wo es keine Unterbrechungen geben darf. Solange man die Anleitung befolgt und Warnmeldungen auch beachtet / abarbeitet und nicht ignoriert ist noch nie etwas schief gegangen. Die Kunst ist das lesen, wer...
-
Oostseereiter1 replied to the thread Unterstützung für Proxmox VE 8 endet am 2026-08-31.ja das stimmt nach der OP aber als es mir besser ging habe ich es erst mal vor mich hingeschoben.Jetzt musste ich ja durch.
-
Ttomservo replied to the thread [VirtIO RNG] Clarification re: Using /dev/urandom vs /dev/hwrng ?.None that I know of, but I assume there must be one since the option exists. Maybe for compatibility or safety with older guest OS with less sophisticated RNG?
-
Hhuganega replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.2 – sporadic iSCSI NOP timeouts / DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED with Dell PowerVault ME5 and Intel E810.Hi Tmanok, Thanks for pointing me towards the newer E810 NVM firmware. I checked the adapters more closely and there is one important detail: these are HPE OEM Intel E810-XXVDA2 adapters, not Intel retail adapters. Both adapters were running...