If you put the original SSD in the host, does it boot correctly? AFAIK Clonezilla will not alter the source drive at all. Your thread title suggests that the ORIGINAL SSD will not boot. (If this is not the case, change the title to reflect this)...
Seems like your thin volumes are broken. I can't really explain why CloneZilla would have caused this for the source disk. I'd restore the guests from backups.
Change the title to reflect this. (Possibly: "Impossible to boot any VMs or container after Clonezilla backup, from original drive")
I concur, this is probably not caused by Clonezilla cloning. However there is a chance that an already failing...
I assume you mean to include CTs & VMs starting correctly after host boot.
Do you at least recall, if that drive was always sdg.
Your above ouput of storage.conf above does not seem to reflect any zfs storage (at least in the Proxmox backend)...
the letter might have changed when i removed 2 failing drives. But it also changed a few months ago when I added new drives for a ZFS pool.
This ZFS is not seen by proxmox. One of my VMs is a TrueNAS instance, the disked are passed by Proxmox to...
while I don't think that using sshfs is a great idea, I'd like to know if, network wise, a pbs sync is as intensive as a pbs backup. After all rsync is quite good in transferring only the changes.
Because it's simpler and because the...
again why? Then you need a working PBS for restore, sonething you wouldn't need with another tool like kopia, restic or rsnapshot. These tools are also more storage-agnostic. PBS is the best tool for vm/lxc backups and rather bad for anything else.
sshfs works somehow but you don't get great performance. It's like having the datastore on a nas but worse. There is a reason, why network storage isn't recommended in the docs
I assume you mean to include CTs & VMs starting correctly after host boot.
Do you at least recall, if that drive was always sdg.
Your above ouput of storage.conf above does not seem to reflect any zfs storage (at least in the Proxmox backend)...
Was mich allerdings wundert, ist, dass hier offenbar eine Minor-Version solche Regressions verursacht. Aber ja, scheint heute wohl normal zu sein: Release fast, release often und dazu noch ordentlich Featuritis.
Selbst ZFS, also das Filesystem...
I prefer to save everything on PBS, currently I'm using ~350GB with 7 days of backups retained, but it will most probably grow (especially immich if and when I give access to my doughter :D).
A 1TB storage box is 3.8€ (with VAT) a month...
sorry, but I also can't leave this uncommented :
(imho LVM is the most underrated storage "virtualization" toolset in Linux)
LVM included:
transparent compression: dm-vdo (incl.dedup + thin provisioning + zero block detection)
guaranteed...
Ich würde den kompletten übergeordneten Ordner sichern. Frißt kein Brot und eine evtl. überflüssige Sicherung von kompletten Konfigurationseinstellungen tut nicht weh. Gilt nur, sofern du diesen nicht schon meintest und nur ein unglückliches Bild...
Thanks, ggoller!!
One last question:
Does that mean dnsmasq will or won't help me with evpn+vxlan guests? When you say external dhcp are you meaning more like KeaDHCP?
Follow-up question:
If the answer is dnsmasq won't help; Is it in the...
Was mich allerdings wundert, ist, dass hier offenbar eine Minor-Version solche Regressions verursacht. Aber ja, scheint heute wohl normal zu sein: Release fast, release often und dazu noch ordentlich Featuritis.
Selbst ZFS, also das Filesystem...