Latest activity
-
Wweppa replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.I'm back at -5 and the problem vanished . So basically the problem appeared in -6 (as per Galaxis) , is still there in -8, I was just a bit late in the game. If it's a new kernel feature and not the sign of the disks getting crazy, it sure...
-
-
Rryzenixx replied to the thread I made a small native macOS menu bar app for Proxmox VE.Hey! Sorry, I completely missed your reply, and I apologize for getting back to you so late. Unfortunately, I'm primarily a macOS developer and don't have a Windows machine. Also, I have to admit that C# isn't really my favorite language to work...
-
Wweppa reacted to Galaxis's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with
Like.
Since @weppa writes it was still fine in -5 (which I skipped coming from -4), and the effect first showed up for me in -6, something must have happened between those two versions. -
GGalaxis reacted to weppa's post in the thread Increased latency on disks since 9.2.6 and associated 7.0.x kernel with Like.
Thanks @Neobin ! In the meantime proxmox-boot-tool kernel pin 7.0.14-5-pve proxmox-boot-tool refresh UPDATE : I can confirm the problem DISAPPEARS with kernel 7.0.14-5 So it's specific to kernels after this one.
-
GGalaxis replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Since @weppa writes it was still fine in -5 (which I skipped coming from -4), and the effect first showed up for me in -6, something must have happened between those two versions.
-
J_--James--_ replied to the thread ProxmoxVE and the shared root account for update/upgrades..I agree that GitOps, Ansible, sudo, and similar tooling are all valid operational approaches. My point isn't that there are no workarounds. My point is that the supported first-party GUI still lacks an enterprise identity model for host lifecycle...
-
Llonger replied to the thread VM Migration error.You can use: apt autoremove To clear the old kernel images from the previous boot.
-
Bbl1mp replied to the thread ProxmoxVE and the shared root account for update/upgrades..Well, you can limit the sudo priviledge by specifying the exact commands that should be capable to run. (e.g. %test ALL=(ALL:ALL) /usr/bin/apt update, /usr/bin/apt upgrade -y) and sudo logs all actions to journalctl If you like to try out a...
-
JjAston reacted to xybo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Wrong default bootloader entry: "Reboot into firmware interface" with Like.
Have you checked this https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/advice-needed-upgrade-pve-8-to-9-using-systemd-boot-with-zfs-rpool-uefi-and-no-secure-boot.181956/
-
JjAston replied to the thread [SOLVED] Wrong default bootloader entry: "Reboot into firmware interface".Thanks, lsblk -f shows a UUID for the EFI System Partition, so I don't think this solution applies to my case. I also don't want to reformat the ESP without knowing that it is actually the problem.
-
Oorkiniec replied to the thread Dell R760 High I/O Pressure with NFS, but No Measurable VM Impact.Thanks for this suggestion. I will need to run this tonight during a quieter period since i do have production running. Would a smaller sample, such as 32 GiB, still provide a useful comparison between TrueNAS, PVE01 (node 1), and PVE99 (node 2)...
-
Bbl1mp reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread ProxmoxVE and the shared root account for update/upgrades. with Like.
I think the main issue with adding such a feature to the API would be that anybody who can do system upgrades basically gets "root" powers. So if your compilance requirements are that you need to limit the potential breakage done by a single...
-
JJonathonFS reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread [SOLVED] Cannot find ACME in Datacenter menu anymore with Like.
AFAIK, to be able to see the ACME menu in the GUI (above Firewall menu), you have to be logged in as root user.
-
J_--James--_ replied to the thread ProxmoxVE and the shared root account for update/upgrades..You mean as in paying for the subscriptions? which every enterprise I manage have deployed PVE on does? Love how this comes back to "you want a feature then contribute" when that is not even the issue here. If you mean open a ticket, or file a...
-
gyptazy replied to the thread ProxmoxVE and the shared root account for update/upgrades..True. Then it's probably about starting to contribute :) -
Ssnullp replied to the thread PSA: ZFS performance bug on >=256k recordsize.If your system have lots of free RAM, but: 1. swap is full, 2. ARC lower than your expectation and 3. have an active dataset with >=256k recordsize. You might be affected by this bug. You can try stop the workload on the dataset to see if...
-
Iimpact83 reacted to yves.menge's post in the thread Lockout of Minisforum MS-A2! Brick Warning ! ; after 1.03 update of 9955hx with Like.
I have the 9000 cpu on mine.
-
Iimpact83 replied to the thread Lockout of Minisforum MS-A2! Brick Warning ! ; after 1.03 update of 9955hx.Thank you. got my MS-A2 9955hx downgraded with your file from 1.03 to 1.02 and PCIE-Passthrou works again unter proxmox. Many many thanks PS: i even reportet the problem in detail to minisforum.
-
Wwaltar replied to the thread Dell R760 High I/O Pressure with NFS, but No Measurable VM Impact.ZFS don't like nfs default export sync behavior which can be a bit alleviated with a slog device. Your 25Gb node1 still shows more I/O pressure as data would come faster as on the other and so normally you see the higher pressure there. Download...
-
Ssnullp posted the thread PSA: ZFS performance bug on >=256k recordsize in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I have been seeing this issue for years and recently I finally figured it out: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/18893 Before this bug is fixed do not use recordsize that is >= 256k.
