Phew. Sorry, I'm out of ideas there. You'll probably have to keep digging around and tinkering in the BIOS. I have M900s here too, and they work just fine.
Which virtualisation error? While Installation?
"Virtualisation" is likely a spelling or translation error.
German -> Virtualisation
English -> Virtualization
Ganz schön voller Sack an Fragen.
K.A. Wie bekomme ich einen weiteren Koffer in meinen vollen Kofferraum?
Z.B ein zweiter PBS im Pullbetrieb oder eine parallele Sicherung per vzdump.
vzdump-files ja, kompletter PBS-Inhalt weniger. Dafür nutzt...
I'm using a Lenovo M900 with an i5-6500t. In the bios I have intel virtualization enabled and vt-d enabled. TPM is disabled. Secure boot is disabled. Not sure if there's any other setting that might matter. Despite this I am still getting the...
Complicated solution to an easy problem.
Proxmox should just remove the MiB. Instead, do it like most other software.
Allow the user to input Number X plus M or G.
Like 512M or 4G.
For future reference. For some reason (my incompetence) my VM drives for these 2 VMs were located -on- the NAS, which is of course, why they were showing up in the conf. Also explains how slow the one that was in use was. No idea how I managed...
Thanks for the reply, I understand that I can perform some kind of “trial & error” process, changing this and that.
However Initial point was related to understand if someone knows which are the possibile causes of a iGPU passed though and...
I'm currently looking to build a virtual environment for some certification studies. Specifically Palo Alto and Cisco equipment. So, it's not going to be a production environment really. I just finished installing Proxmax VE and ran into a few...
Seems more like the agent you’re using isn’t properly built, since ZFS can do things like compression and deduplication, du/df isn’t an accurate way of representing the ZFS volume.
This one seems to be closer to what you want to do...
For future reference. For some reason (my incompetence) my VM drives for these 2 VMs were located -on- the NAS, which is of course, why they were showing up in the conf. Also explains how slow the one that was in use was. No idea how I managed...
Kein Bu66as-Post im Thread bisher, also wäre das eine Erst-Antwort. Der Thread ist bereits sehr ausführlich diskutiert (aaron, Falk R., Johannes S haben klar Stellung bezogen), aber ein Punkt fehlt noch: den NetworkManager-vs-ifupdown2-Konflikt...