Die Gruppe, die ihre rudimentären, unsortierten Gedanken einer Schnitzeljagd gleich in ein Forum kippen und bei etwaigen Rückfragen pampig reagieren, ist m.E. am größten. Das ganze am besten mit SW-Versionen, die EOL sind.
Ich habe mal davon gehört, dass jemand ein xfce oder ähnliches auf ein PVE installiert hat, entweder war das hier im Forum, oder sonst wo. ABER: Ich würde das auf gar keinen Fall tun. Las einfach den Hypervisor einen Hypervisor sein. Du brauchst...
A colleague is working on documentation for this, but I cannot provide an ETA at this moment. But in general, most of the variables/helpers that are available are already used by the existing templates, so the easiest option is just to use them...
Yeah, that seems to be it. I dug through the ntfy documentation, seems like any message longer than 4096 bytes will be sent as an attachment, and apparently the default self-hosted version of ntfy does not allow attachments [1].
Yes, actually...
With the amount of data we need to store and the drive bays available mirrors are not an option, higher raid levels also require more space so not an option. raidz1 is the only option we have with these servers providing a degree of resilience...
Might be related to:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ifupdown2-fun-after-upgrade.181322/
Please post any relevant output of journalctl right before it messages about the dependency failure.
Also post the output of pveversion and your network...
Thank you @fiona
I think that might be the issue I'm having, which would also affect all HP EliteDesk 800 G1's
Any guidance on how to test it?
This is what I did for now to be able to have Secure Boot enabled:
1) Installed PBS from scratch...
Not recommended for performance, see this post.
Also, from the naming it looks like you are using Samsung 960's, this is a consumer-grade drive, & won't last long with this config.
> dm_ism_commit_idle_optimization_state+0xee/0x250 [amdgpu]
> amdgpu_dm_ism_commit_event+0x104/0x770 [amdgpu]
> dm_ism_sso_delayed_work_func+0x40/0x60 [amdgpu]
Could this be a regression caused by the following change...
Hallo,
ich hatte einen Cluster aus 3 Nodes am laufen, habe zwei Nodes heruntergefahren und dann mit "pvecm delnode xxxx" entfernt.
Ein "pvecm nodes" liefert mir auch nur noch eine Node (ID 1) zurück.
In der GUI sehe ich aber trotzdem noch eine...
Definetly and also quite heavy...
You can use CPU-Type "host", you just need to remove the "nested-virt" flag like mentioned previously. This should prevent VBS from being enabled.
Better be safe than sorry.