Eher weniger, hier spielt das lokale Storage auf dem PBS eine entscheidende Rolle: wenn du kein Full-Flash-System hast, wird das das Problem sein.
Eine akzeptable Performance erreicht man mit lokalen ZFS auf Festplatten, wenn man special devices...
Thank you for confirming. Both disks will be 2TB.
I take it that sgdisk --zap-all /dev/sdX will be sufficient for clearing all disk structures before attaching it to the zfs pool?
I will read the man page to get a better understanding of the...
i guess it's not checked because such a check will always be incomplete. to check every vm we'd have to iterate over all vm configs on all nodes, but while the check is running nobody is prevented to add the iso to a vm again. alternatively the...
Hi @philippms
vielen Dank für deinen Post!
SMB / CIFS ist im Vergleich ein relativ redseliges Protokoll und mag daher Latenzen nicht besonders.
Da der Proxmox Backup Server für seinen Sync zwischen Remotes HTTP(S) verwendet, welches besser mit...
Hit a hard regression on 7.0.12-1-pve on a Ryzen 9 5950X box - after a routine reboot, no VM or container would start. `qm start` returned without error but guests stayed `stopped`, and load sat at ~8 with nothing actually running.
Root cause is...
Absolut. Steht außer Frage.
Ich frage mich nur: Lohnt der Aufwand, drei PBS Systeme zu betreiben, die als Remote kommunizieren oder bringt das nicht den großen Vorteil gegenüber der CIFS-Lösung?
Die CIFS-Lösung hat unter Veeam jahrelang gut...
Hi,
I have a 3 nodes in proxmox cluster
on each node I have clustered storage, i use it for ISO images. this storage mount as local
# cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg
dir: isorepo
path /mnt/ocfs
content vztmpl,import,iso,snippets,rootdir...
Hi all,
I’m running into an issue with WSL2 inside a Windows Server 2025 VM after upgrading to Linux Kernel 7.0 and QEMU 11, and I’m hoping someone else has seen this or can point me in the right direction.
Environment
Proxmox cluster with 2...
looks like kernel 7.0.13 has some bnxt_en fixes, though unclear if any of them are actually relevant to the crashes we're seeing.
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v7.x/ChangeLog-7.0.13
guessing it'll be awhile before those changes get...
If you do that yes, if you don't it won't. You have to do it manually with zfs clone and that is just a reference clone, but you need to do this yourself, e.g. with ansible or any other tooling of your choice:
create a VM, this will create it...
Hi,
please provide the VM configuration qm config ID with the numerical ID of an affected VM as well as the output of pveversion -v. Can you see anything in the host system logs/journal? What kind of guest OS and kernel does the VM use?
# pct start 103 --debug
run_buffer: 569 Script exited with status 255
lxc_init: 1037 Failed to run lxc.hook.pre-start for container "103"
__lxc_start: 2208 Failed to initialize container "103"
hostid 100000 range 65536
INFO lsm -...
No, as of now, the newest version in the enterprise repository is still 6.8.12-28-pve and the broken version will only be imported to the enterprise repository at the same time as the fixed version.
AFAIK, this is a (hopefully) temporary limitation that has been worked on in the past and it only concerns the EFI disk.
You can always create a cloned VM manually yourself, if you build a new VM, clone the data disk and create a new EFI disk...
You could use a third Witnees machine to orchestrate the replicas. Try it as a VM on one of the nodes, but then plan to move it outside. It also runs on a Raspberry.
Hi @brnogu,
The kernel update addressing this specific issue has already been released. It is available on the no-subscription repo as version 7.0.12-1-pve.
Well yes, but this would be making a full clone right?
My understanding was that Ceph must have at least 3 Nodes. It would be then possible to achieve this with one server only? We would have only one server with mutpile storages that we planned...