Latest activity
-
Fftodino posted the thread Tape Backup to Standalone Tape Drives with very large PVE VMs in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.I've hit a very frustrating set of circumstances in trying to backup our Nextcloud DataPortal which is a very large VM of about 30TB onto LTO-9 tapes (for a truly offline airgapped set of backups). Due to the size, the backup requires at least...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Botton line: use whatever fits you. I am using GlusterFS, Ceph, Drbd + Pacemaker + iSCSI + OCFS2, and guest what? Works for me in N scenario. And again: use whatever fits you and your customers...
-
MMadscientist replied to the thread Ceph Squid to Tentacle.thanks
-
DDomino reacted to mfederanko's post in the thread In Proxmox 9.2.3 what is this UI checkbox for? with
Like.
Here [0] is the relevant documentation section. [0] https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#pct_container_network -
Gguruevi replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Your SAS controller is supported in current flavors of Linux and will be for quite some time to come. This isn't Windows, there is hardware from the 90s that is still supported in Linux. As for performance, you're comparing apples and oranges...
-
TI would opt for a barebones/used "big name" mini PC such as the HP Elitedesk 805 G8 Desktop Mini, mainly because parts and support are easier to get, and they are mass produced by the hundreds of thousands, and frequently better validated with...
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.I've been on the glusterfs mailing list since 2019 and I monitor the traffic on said mailing list. Again, there are times when there's more activity on said mailing list than other times (usually when people have issues and/or questions)...
-
CCarlos Gomes reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
Yes you can also use ocfs or gfs or any other file system supported by Linux, that's nothing new ;) They are not integrated and (propably) not tested or supported in the GUI though, meaning that in case of problems you are on your own. This might...
-
SteveITS replied to the thread Proxmox 9.2.2 with Ceph Squid bad write performance.There are tests for Ceph that can be run on the host and avoid any potential VM issues. For a Windows VM, ensure you're following the guide to use SCSI, as well as not using a "host" CPU type (see various forum threads). -
Zzelbanna replied to the thread RTX 5070 Ti GPU passthrough fails in Proxmox – stuck in D3 / FLR reset loop → device becomes unresponsive (ffff).Got the same issue on latest proxmox VE 9.2.3, Kernel 6.17 or 7.0.6, intel machine and same ReBAR/Above 4G settings in BIOS as you I've gone the full circle on trying to get the card to work, blacklisting modules, grub settings and vfio...
-
Aalpha754293 reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
The gluster project is not dead. It's slow... Not dead... Long live to GlusterFS!
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.The gluster project is not dead. It's slow... Not dead... Long live to GlusterFS!
-
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to alpha754293's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
Two things: 1) As I mentioned, I'm running Proxmox 7.4-20 on the host system because kernel 6.8 that ships with Proxmox 8 by default doesn't work with the aforementioned 9361-8i. Who cares if it's old, if it works (vs. it not working)? If it is...
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to alpha754293's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
Sorry for resurrecting this old thread, but I am testing both ceph and gluster right now on my 4930K system (because it's what I have that I can spin up quickly with as few variables between systems as possible). Subjectively, the Win11 23H2...
-
cheiss replied to the thread Roll out "custom certificate" updates via shell / api?.Oh, my bad - completely overlooked that you are talking about Mail Gateway! Anyhow, the correct endpoint would be: https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/api-viewer/index.html#/nodes/{node}/certificates/custom/{type} As for the CLI, there is the... -
Wwattcheck_lab replied to the thread Suggesting for Low power Mini PC.Late to this, but the "low power" half of the ask never got answered with actual numbers, and that is exactly where 8-core AMD mini PCs trip people up, so here are measured idle figures for the boxes in play. Idle on these tracks the AMD...
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Two things: 1) As I mentioned, I'm running Proxmox 7.4-20 on the host system because kernel 6.8 that ships with Proxmox 8 by default doesn't work with the aforementioned 9361-8i. Who cares if it's old, if it works (vs. it not working)? If it is...
-
JI think PVE support several standard Linux/Debian packages for this and it's not managed by Proxmox. The manual suggests manually editing the default chrony configuration...
-
JOne way to prefer the internal NTP servers and still not modify chrony.conf is to add a new file in /etc/chrony/sources.d directory, like internal.sources: server x.y.z iburst prefer server a.b.c iburst prefer Note that this does not remove the...
-
MMarkku replied to the thread Time servers.One way to prefer the internal NTP servers and still not modify chrony.conf is to add a new file in /etc/chrony/sources.d directory, like internal.sources: server x.y.z iburst prefer server a.b.c iburst prefer Note that this does not remove the...
