Thanks, the only concern was that i have over 50TB of zfs pool data on my pve. on my backup server i don't know if I have enough drives to get a zfs pool that size up, which is why i originally went with unraid (ability to use diff drive sizes)...
I'm pretty sure PBS only backs up to ZFS datastores. Edit: PBS is tolerant of any "normal" filesystem (per UdoB below).
But I don't understand your concern. ZFS is, I think, the best way to make leftover drives into one or more pools, even...
As for Linux, I suppose shim is replaced using apt or something similar, but judging from other threads, I’m a bit concerned about whether it will work properly.
Linux
mokutil --sb-state
mokutil --db | grep -A13 "\[key"
mokutil --dbx | grep -A13...
dumb question, i have my zfs data pool on my proxmox pve, this tool looks exactly what i am looking for. I had been rsyncing to an older unraid xfs array server. If I were to get rid of the unraid server and put PBS on it, would it then need to...
First extend the Phyisical Volume to the extents of the partition: pvresize /dev/sda3
Check with pvdisplay if the PV Size is now correct.
Find out the LV Path of the logical volume you want to resize with lvdisplay | grep Path.
Extend the Logical...
Thanks for your reply.
I'm asking as in the storage matrix LVM snapshots are no longer marked with a 5, but then in the link it says its still in tech preview.
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage
AFAIK, in the past, the preview state was lost when a new major update was released, e.g. ZFS was introduces in 3.2 as a tech preview and out of preview in PVE 4.0
Thanks for the info.
I would indeed assume that only my first backup is as big as the disk itself. (Since debian by default writes garbage to the disk before adding LUKS to prevent old data leaking.)
And after that just small updates as things...
Trying to figure out why my Proxmox 9 (pve-manager/9.1.2/9d436f37a0ac4172) is pinning my network interfaces the way that it does.
I have read the manual, but the referenced altnames does not seem to apply to the second network interface.
That...
Well..., I did not verify this actively, but: yes.
The backup process will copy the content of the virtual harddisk into the backup system. Whether the raw disk is encrypted or not should be completely irrelevant. At the end the virtual disk is...
I have been burnt by this in the past when purging configuration from uninstalled packages (with ifupdown and grub-pc). I assumed common files were factored out in to some shared dependency but IIRC some configuration came from postinst scripts.
The content seems fine. I just picked a very few pages and read them quickly/fast - I dug into them only slightly. (And English is not my native language...)