Latest activity
-
MMister X replied to the thread [SOLVED] ifupdown2 and /etc/network/interfaces issue.Hm?! Fixed? We updated one node in a cluster yust now. The package seems to be not fixed.
-
GGMBauer replied to the thread Kaufberatung Hardware homelab.Würde ich nie kaufen. Dafür dass die "leer" sind und halt doch nicht richtig erweitert werden können, sind die mir zu teuer. Der kleinste kostet leer 440 Euro. Wenn ich 100 Euro für Netzteil und Gehäuse rechne (das geht...), dann habe ich 340...
-
TTErxleben replied to the thread Kaufberatung Hardware homelab.Sicherlich ein Gehäuse, welches sogar in Produktivsystemen verwendet werden kann und inzwischen sogar namhaft ist. 19" ist in heutiger Zeit eben häufig raus. Preislich aber nicht gerade ein Gottesgeschenk.
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke).From my experience, HDD-only storage for the PBS datastore really is a no go. As soon as you're on SSD, performance will be doable. I have been using mirrored consumer SATA SSD's (860 EVO, with DRAM cache) and this proved to be an infinite amount...
-
jsterr reacted to THE_BIG_ONE's post in the thread Q35 v11.0 causes extreme corruption on many VMs Linux/BSD/Windows (STOP 0x8007025d) with
Like.
I have performed 6 successful installs across 5 different Proxmox PCs with this morning's pve-qemu-kvm v11.0.0-3 using qcow2 with SSD + Trim/Discard enabled and no seen issues. I am currently now performing 3x in-place repair / upgrades across 3x... -
DDR. Ignaz Gortngschirl replied to the thread [SOLVED] Web UI extremely slow after update, but server resources are fine (High "Blocked" time in API calls).Same for me, on VE 9.1.11 also with a FortiGate in between but this does not play any role.
-
Ttalos reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
TTHE_BIG_ONE replied to the thread Q35 v11.0 causes extreme corruption on many VMs Linux/BSD/Windows (STOP 0x8007025d).I have performed 6 successful installs across 5 different Proxmox PCs with this morning's pve-qemu-kvm v11.0.0-3 using qcow2 with SSD + Trim/Discard enabled and no seen issues. I am currently now performing 3x in-place repair / upgrades across 3x...
-
Ddfiorenza reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
Vvirtualizerforlife replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unable to connect to internet when creating LXC without unprivileged container option.pct config <id> gives following information for working container: and for broken container
-
RRainerM replied to the thread Proxmox booting - zfs [FAILED] file system message shown.Thanks for the info. I opted for ZFS with Direct Write-Through, as this seemed best suited for 5* 12 TB hard drives and I wanted OVM to manage the drives directly. I had hoped to be able to easily move these data drives to another computer...
-
UdoB replied to the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors.Yes, that's my understanding too. Only when the (additional!) filesystem layer has an additional read-cache or an additional write-cache (lying about "finished writing your datablock") in any way, it may actually look faster. Disclaimer: with... -
Vvirtualizerforlife replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unable to connect to internet when creating LXC without unprivileged container option.Privileged (unchecked the unprivileged container option when creating CT): Unprivileged container with nesting checked: In the broken container the ip r didnt return anything. ip a returns following:
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
I wonder about the discrepancy between block- and file-based storage. I remember several reports, that block-storage actually perform äs better since it avoids the overhead of a filesystem.
-
Mmow replied to the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke).Tip: Don't use newer Intenso High for anything important. I have 100% failure rate after 2 years. First they get slow as hell, then bad sectors show up long before the TBW is reached, and the SSD obviously doesn't proper maintenance and only...
-
NNhoague replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Heck yea! Something else to geek out on now!
-
NNhoague reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
NNhoague reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
Congratulations! As usual, we will dedicate a separate environment for testing for our mutual customers. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
NNhoague reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
Great day! Great news... Dynamic Load Balancer is a killer feature...
-
UdoB reacted to Impact's post in the thread Proxmox booting - zfs [FAILED] file system message shown with Like.
This is just one of the reasons you shouldn't use ZFS on raw device mapped disks: https://www.truenas.com/community/resources/absolutely-must-virtualize-truenas-a-guide-to-not-completely-losing-your-data.212/