Latest activity

  • C
    Thanks, although this is still empty: root@pve02:~# iptables -t nat -L Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination...
  • T
    I removed the nvme device, disconnected cd drive, front usb, front card reader etc. then disabled tpm setting (I think that's what it was) in bios. Then problem solved.
  • G
    is not enough to show nat/PREROUTING rules. what about ? iptables -t nat -L
  • dcsapak
    dcsapak replied to the thread Opentelemetry metrics format..
    no, AFAIK the open telemetry plugin in PVE only supports json currently.
  • G
    not fix the issue but you can restrict Windows firewall rule to your LAN scope.
  • C
    So nodes upgraded and rebooted, still seems to be a problem. I've cross checked the configurations across all nodes and Host > Firewall settings are exactly the same. I've run iptables -L and they are all empty.
  • B
    Um mal zum Thema zurückzukommen: ich würde als erstes ein BIOS-Update machen (gibt ein neues aus 03/2026) und danach die Defaultwerte setzen. Dann alles durchschauen, ob irgendwo eine Einstellung ist, die Probleme machen könnte. Bitte vorher...
  • cheiss
    Great! Please just mark the thread as SOLVED by editing the first post - this helps others find this thread more easily when searching! :)
  • 6
    6equj5 replied to the thread [SOLVED] OpenTelemetry server.
    Seems to work with SigNoz ...
  • bbgeek17
    @d.oishi , You are correct: regardless of the layer at which thin provisioning is implemented, careful monitoring must be in place. Unexpectedly running out of space is rarely handled gracefully by operating systems or applications. Cheers...
  • L
    Unified PMG Tracking Center (multi-node) I built a small open-source web UI that gives you a single Tracking Center for a Proxmox Mail Gateway cluster. Instead of logging into each PMG node, it queries each node’s official PMG API...
  • D
    My understanding is that even if the SAN is thin-provisioned, Proxmox shared LVM still sees each LUN as fixed-capacity storage. So for a single LUN, the amount of VM disk space you can allocate does not increase beyond the LUN size. The benefit...
  • M
    I have PVE node with 2 VMs and ~15 CTs. Shutdown of the whole box takes about 15 min. Should I consider it to be normal? Yes, of course step-by-step halting of all the containers must take some time, but I would like to know what is your experience.
  • K
    as response to myself with the higher power consumtion. Fixed it by installing the latest revision and a couple of reboots. No idea what cause it, but one core stayed stuck on Max Freq. Now its back to normal. (7.0.2-4-pve)
  • bbgeek17
    Using thin pool inside your storage device is completely independent of client connectivity. You will be completely fine using that option. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • fiona
    It seems the level=30 parameter was required since back in 2024. Are you sure you didn't already have it before QEMU 11 and kernel 7? Windows is very finicky when it comes to virtual hardware unfortunately. With the override, the CPU...
  • dakralex
    Hi! In general, the cluster nodes should have the same package versions installed to function properly. The HA Manager also has some basic assumptions, as is described in the relevant documentation section [0]. Specifically, if specific nodes...
  • C
    Thanks for your reply! No, iptables is empty. I have been testing from an online port testing tool - still open at the moment. However, if I migrate it to another node, the port correctly appears closed. This server needs updating anyway so I...
  • R
    rahman reacted to fabian's post in the thread Slow forums? with Like Like.
    like many other sites and pieces of public infrastructure, ours is getting hammered by AI scrapers/bots as well. we try our best to implement counter measures, but it's a constant game of whack-a-mole.
  • G
    GazdaJezda replied to the thread PVE upgrade 6.4 to 7, 8, 9....
    Unfortunatelly guys, I need to ask again: can I still upgrade my current 6.4 PVE to 7.x or I will break something because it is too old and something vital is missing on the net / repositories? I know it is old, but is constantly have other...