Well when I use the spfquery via cli, it passes each time. When I go by IP address or URL, it passes. nslookup on PMG shows all the IP addresses. It can't be uncommon for SPF to have a URL? I have turned off SPF for now, but would be curious...
Very possible, I'm reading about others with issues with pfsense not binding the DNS, but I dont use pfsense. I'm in the CLI doing some testing! Ill share results when I find something! haha
Your point don't address the root concern though. It's quite difficult to proove that a certain Software doesn't have a specific feature ( aka malicious code) due to the Halteproblem. Thus scanning with antivirus snakeoil only shows that your exe...
EDIT:
After digging deeper and deeper into this I got kinda lost and forgot to "fail fast". So I stepped back and looked for an alternative and it turns out rclone talks to Storj natively via the uplink library. No hosted gateway, no self-hosted...
Ludus is built on Proxmox and installs in nested virtualization EC2.
https://ludus.cloud/
I am having some issues in getting VMs built, but at least it does a wizard guided Proxmox install.
I use ZRAM everywhere. Makes partitioning simpler and backups smaller.
Also discussed here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/to-swap-or-not-to-swap.181314/
Yes, you’re right! virtio-win-0.1.285 has a significant issue. You can find it here: https://github.com/virtio-win/kvm-guest-drivers-windows/issues/1453.
The issue was resolved in...
Also: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabc-why-is-proxmoxve-using-all-my-ram-and-why-cant-i-see-the-real-ram-usage-of-the-vms-in-the-dashboard.165943/
(I added this link to my previous post but you replied before my edit, so you might not...
Yes :-)
See e.g. https://www.linuxatemyram.com/
P.S.
And https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabc-why-is-proxmoxve-using-all-my-ram-and-why-cant-i-see-the-real-ram-usage-of-the-vms-in-the-dashboard.165943/
Swap inside (Linux) VMs is just as advantageous. Having ZFS (or BTRFS) underneath those VMs is not ideal, but should not be a problem (with enterprise drives) unless they start thrashing, which is a problem of and in itself.
Writing every once in...
Nur für den Fall der Fälle:
Ein 6.17er Kernel sollte sich in einem 24.04er Ubuntu (Codename noble) problemlos installieren lassen. Im Falle von 24.04.4 sollte dieser dann eh schon standardmäßig aktiv sein.
Siehe z.B. hier...
Your point don't address the root concern though. It's quite difficult to proove that a certain Software doesn't have a specific feature ( aka malicious code) due to the Halteproblem. Thus scanning with antivirus snakeoil only shows that your exe...