Latest activity
-
MMarkus54292 replied to the thread Getrennter Speicher für Daten und System.Hey, guck' mal nach den Werten der externen SSD. Grenzen können neben dem USB 3.1 auch in der BUS-Schnittstelle der SSD (SAS/SATA I, II, III) oder den Leistungswerten der SSD liegen. Gruß
-
Pproxuser77 replied to the thread snap shots Backup script.1. Offsite ist nochmal etwas ganz anderes, davon rede ich in diesem Kontext gar nicht. 2. Diesen Pull-Backup-Server würde man dann natürlich entsprechend abschotten. 3. Im Falle von PVE mit PBS funktioniert das Konzept nur mit einem zweiten...
-
MMarkusKo replied to the thread Wenn alle Container und VMs runtergefahren sind - kein Internet mehr - Container schuld?.Ja, ohne DNS gibts kein Internet.
-
MMarkku reacted to shanreich's post in the thread SDN: Nodes do not advertise their own routes with
Like.
@ggoller is working with upstream to get this fixed, there is this PR [1], but it hasn't made it into the new FRR release so I'm afraid this will still have to wait. [1] https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/20005 -
KKusselin posted the thread Wenn alle Container und VMs runtergefahren sind - kein Internet mehr - Container schuld? in Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German).Hallo Zusammen, ich habe ein kurioses Phänomen. Ich habe gestern nach Container Updates und PVE-Update Proxmox neu gestartet. Nachdem Proxmox für einige Minuten aus war hatte ich kein Internet. Woran kann das liegen? Kann das an meinem...
-
fba reacted to psalkiewicz's post in the thread Nested Tree View for Pools on the Web GUI with Like.
Support for nested pools was added in PVE 8.1, allowing up to 3 levels of nesting for greater flexibility in structuring VMs and containers. Pool names can contain at most two slashes, structured as parent/child/grandchild. -
SSim0n reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread [SOLVED] Cannot find ACME in Datacenter menu anymore with Like.
AFAIK, to be able to see the ACME menu in the GUI (above Firewall menu), you have to be logged in as root user.
-
Rrage replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription.MeteorLake was only the Mobile Ultra100 CPUs https://www.intel.de/content/www/de/de/ark/products/codename/90353/products-formerly-meteor-lake.html ArrowLake is Ultra 200 for Desktop and Mobiles...
-
Aabamalu replied to the thread Ceph performance in VM not that good.Oh... I created this post with my private account and not with my company account.
-
CCGjung reacted to psalkiewicz's post in the thread Nested Tree View for Pools on the Web GUI with Like.
Support for nested pools was added in PVE 8.1, allowing up to 3 levels of nesting for greater flexibility in structuring VMs and containers. Pool names can contain at most two slashes, structured as parent/child/grandchild.
-
CThe UI for nested pools was introduced not that long ago; in pve-manager 9.1.5: pve-manager (9.1.5) trixie; urgency=medium [..] * ui: resource tree: don't show empty grouping nodes as expandable. * ui: resource tree: show nested pools...
-
MMarco Lucarelli reacted to mahesh07's post in the thread Ceph Slow Performance On All Flash NVME with Like.
any update on this?
-
MMarco Lucarelli reacted to konold's post in the thread Ceph Slow Performance On All Flash NVME with Like.
Was this finally merged into production?
-
M@spirit: Thank you for the concrete numbers and references — that's very helpful. I was wrong to be dismissive earlier about the allocator angle. The Ceph blog you linked (QEMU/KVM Tuning) reports a ~50% improvement on 16KB random reads (53.5k →...
-
MMarco Lucarelli replied to the thread Ceph performance in VM not that good.Update: In another post I have read about TCMAlloc and have done some benchmark. LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtcmalloc_minimal.so.4 qm start 1000 # It works also with override.conf in the systemd services # pve-guests.service #...
-
Jjoseph.john replied to the thread [SOLVED] want to upgrade present ceph version 17.2.8 to the latest CEPH stable version , if one node has different CEPH version will it effet the cluster.we upgraded now we running proxmox 9.1 in all the nodes did first change the repo of all the nodes , then one by one we did ProxMOX Rocks , such a great prodcut upgrdation checks all the prereuistive and gives u warning and errors before hand
-
Jjoseph.john reacted to apoyen's post in the thread [SOLVED] want to upgrade present ceph version 17.2.8 to the latest CEPH stable version , if one node has different CEPH version will it effet the cluster with Like.
Hello, There is an official documentation for upgrading ceph : https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Ceph_Quincy_to_Reef
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Ram report issue to multiple Hosts with Like.
Virtualization makes the most sense when you use it to break down work into small chunks. Imagine trying to fit tetris pieces that are 4 squares, and then you have a piece that is 48 squares in size. If your use case is really that big, the only...
-
BHello everyone, I have a small 3-node PVE cluster at home that I mess with and learn on. Each node has 1 onboard NIC (eno1), Mellanox 10GB NIC (CEPH) and 2 USB3 NICs, one for Corosync and the other for Proxmox Backup Server. Initially, all of...
-
-
Jjaminmc reacted to matada89's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription with Like.
Well, with the 6.18 kernel being absolutely unusable due to SATA controller dropouts crashing containers using NFS and occasionally the entire Proxmox host I expected a repeat with the 7.0 one. Happy to say that it passed every test that would...
