Latest activity
-
UdoB reacted to garfield2008's post in the thread merkwürtiges Netzwerkproblem beim Zugriff auf PVE with
Like.
Ich glaub ich habe die Lösung. Habe gerade mal bei der VM die MTU auf 1500 begrenzt und siehe da, ich komme mit allen Protokollen auf alle PVE/PBS. Bleibt also die Frage, was hat sich vor einem halben Jahr geändert? -
UdoB reacted to Bu66as's post in the thread merkwürtiges Netzwerkproblem beim Zugriff auf PVE with Like.
@garfield2008, Der tcpdump verrät es: Der TCP-Handshake klappt einwandfrei (SYN → SYN-ACK → ACK), aber danach kommt keine Daten-Übertragung zustande — der Server schickt nach 5 Sekunden ein FIN. Das ist ein klassisches MTU-Problem. Schau dir...
-
Cchamathjayasekara5962@gma posted the thread Setting up talos linux on phoenixNap BMC proxmox as a guest os. in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Is it possible to get any help from anyone?, I'm so lost in setting up any guest os in proxmox ve in phoenixNap BMC.
-
Jjaminmc replied to the thread Upgrade to firmware-linux 20260110.Installing the test repository provides access to pve-firmware version 3.18-1, built on firmware-linux 20260110, along with the newer proxmox-kernel-6.17.13-1-pve, which may meet your needs.
-
Aalia80 replied to the thread Proxmox VE update to 9.1.5, now the network card is slow.Additional info: lspci | grep -i ethernet 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe...
-
Aalia80 posted the thread Proxmox VE update to 9.1.5, now the network card is slow in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hello, I recently did an in place upgrade to PVE 9, everything seems to be working fine but now the network card seems to be slow. I run pfSense in a VM with a couple of network interfaces passed through. I have not made any changes to the VM...
-
Ddeimosian replied to the thread enable CONFIG_RUST for Proxmox kernel.Then the next thread will be asking how to disable it.
-
Jjustlikeef replied to the thread Upgrade to firmware-linux 20260110.Sorry, that was a mistype on my part. The kernel version is fine, it's the firmware version that is problematic...
-
Jjaminmc replied to the thread Upgrade to firmware-linux 20260110.Strix appears to require a more recent kernel. One user reported that My Proxmox 6.19.1 pve test kernel works well for them—this version is available for testing at...
-
Jjaminmc replied to the thread enable CONFIG_RUST for Proxmox kernel.The Proxmox kernel is based on Ubuntu’s kernel. Since Ubuntu’s kernel version 6.19 includes CONFIG_RUST enabled by default, and unless the Proxmox team explicitly disables it in their next major release, CONFIG_RUST should remain enabled. As a...
-
Jjaminmc replied to the thread Custom Proxmox 6.19.0 Kernel. 6.18.0 is also available for Testing..I'm glad I could help! Every few days, I check for a newer kernel at the Ubuntu kernel repository on Launchpad, then pull and compile it with the Proxmox magic. If it works, I update my GitHub. It looks like you have the latest version — so far...
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Pardon my less-than-intelligent question, but is there a way to install Proxmox on a Ceph cluster?.If you're using EC (6,2), that's about 75% storage efficiency. If you are using replicated rule with the same eight nodes, and assuming each node contributes 1 OSD, then you have only about 12.5% storage efficiency. 12.5% < 75% no? Can't. Said...
-
Jjaminmc reacted to eikaramba's post in the thread Custom Proxmox 6.19.0 Kernel. 6.18.0 is also available for Testing. with Like.
just wanted to say thanks. I did install the latest 6.19.1 on my proxmox runnnig amd strix halo (framework desktop), and that kernel actually fixed the problem in my immich lxc container running onnx models. Before i was running 6.17 from proxmox...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Pardon my less-than-intelligent question, but is there a way to install Proxmox on a Ceph cluster?."lower" and "higher" are subjective. Ceph achieves HA using raw capacity. suit yourself. this is not a recommended deployment. You are far better served by just having two SEPERATE VMs each serving all those functions without any ceph at all-...
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Pardon my less-than-intelligent question, but is there a way to install Proxmox on a Ceph cluster?.But doesn't replication yield lower storage efficiency? I am currently using EC (2,1) for my "simple" three node Proxmox HA cluster which serves my DNS, Windows AD DC, and AdGuardHome and where the LXC/VM disks reside on the distributed EC Ceph...
-
SSpongeRob replied to the thread PVE 9.1 Installation on Dell R515.OK, OK.. talking to myself again it seems, well should anybody be future searching maybe they'll find this post helpful (hopefully) Here's a quick run down of my testing.. FIRST and I know this is a slight pain, but check your downloaded...
-
-
spirit replied to the thread Proxmox SDN Traffic breakout Interface and routing.if you have talking about the vxlan tunnels themself or the bgp peers, they are simply using the route to reach to remote peers ips. so you can make simple routes on your host if needed. or do you want PBR specifically for the vxlan udp port... -
VVivienM replied to the thread Spontaneous reboots on Minisforum MS-A2 with 6.17 (and later 6.14).AMD microcode is installed. I guess I can find a keyboard/monitor to go poke at the BIOS, but if those things are set wrong, why doesn't 6.14.8-2 have a problem with it? Found something else while googling, someone having similar issues in...
-
BBobhWasatch replied to the thread Spontaneous reboots on Minisforum MS-A2 with 6.17 (and later 6.14).The stuff about setting a slightly higher voltage and/or lower frequency in BIOS seems relevant though. It might also pay to look at what c-states are enabled and whether you have the AMD microcode installed. Other than that I got nuthin'.
-
VVivienM replied to the thread Spontaneous reboots on Minisforum MS-A2 with 6.17 (and later 6.14).I didn't find that much, but I did discover that that message is cut off. Should be "software wrote 0xE to reset control register 0xCF9" When you google that, yes, it starts to get more interesting, but most of what I'm finding so far is about...
