192.168.10.1 is the GW connection of the Proxmox. I use the Tailscale interface 10.2 for incomming connections
WWW->Internet Reverse Proxy -> Tailscale -> 192.168.10.0/24
The network itselve can use the internet without Tailscale.
And in my home...
ich habe gar nicht Port 25 Konfiguriert sondern 465. Das ist ja das doofe, ich verstehe gar nicht woher das kommt. Ich benutze auch nicht sendmail sondern SMTP. Alle anderen Meldungen (proxmox Updates zb.) kommen korrekt nur bei Melungen vom...
@UdoB Thank you for your suggestion!
I used the https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#pvecm_separate_node_without_reinstall - as a reference and was able to get the Corosync.conf files editable. Then i copied the conf file from a...
Hi,
There are only 2 ways to share (phsyical) GPU resource to guests AFAIK:
* use of virtio-gl (though that is currently limited to opengl, vulkan is in the works)
* use of vgpus, though there are multiple ways:
- for intel, there is the intel...
Hallo,
1) nein, die max_spam_size ist viel geringer als die max_mail_size
2) ja, unbound ist installiert und läuft
resolv.conf:
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND --...
Hi all,
I'm just interested in your opinion.
We currently have a "streched" Proxmox-Cluster with 3 nodes using Ceph. Each server holds 7 OSD. Two servers a located in our main datacenter (with emergency power generator etc.) one server runs in...
Hi, @jlgarnier
You probably may boot the VM from some rescue CD image (e.g. Systemrescue). It doesn't require the password of the VM. And then without mounting the original filesystem you can fsck it.
Hi,
feature request needs to be done here : https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/
And don't forget that the main goal of PVE is to be an (enterprise) hypervisor, so there is a good chance that this kind of request will not be accepted.
Best regards,
but such things will really keep proxmox far from "production ready" unless it is stated somewhere (maybe it is, I did not see it): "LXC are NOT for production - just for fun" ;-)
My two cents:
Hi, while this sounds like a cool idea, I wonder whether you shouldn't rather use Openstack or the likes of it, If you want to create a private cloud environment. Although I run my own "private-cloud" with a proxmox cluster...
i have it set up that i sends "spam" message as a notification to each user and if they believe the sender is trusted they hit a link that releases the message and treats it as HAM, if not opened it's spam.
hey, I've been testing scrollout F1 for about 2 weeks now and I like it. also using it inside a KVM (installed with their own ISO) - LXC doesn't work here.
Only seeing two drawbacks to using it:
- no way for users/domains to separately manage...
Statt eines Rackservers, der in der Basis ohne RAM und CPU schon knapp 1k € kostet, wäre eine gebrauchte Workstation wahrscheinlich günstiger (wenn es denn Markenhardware sein muss). Da bekommst Du ebenfalls solide Komponenten für den 24/7...
Grundsätzlich ist eine Auslastung über 100% möglich, da nun seit Proxmox VE 9.0 auch die Host Memory Usage hinzugerechnet wird, was besonders bei VMs ohne Ballooning bedeutet, dass das konfigurierte, maximale Memory Assignment überschritten...