Latest activity

What's new Featured content New posts New profile posts Latest activity
  • D
    dgsnb reacted to Dunuin's post in the thread [SOLVED] How can I force swappiness=0 with Like Like.
    As far as I know swappiness=0 isn't supported anymore. If you don't want swapping at all, why don't you just remove your swap partition (open /etc/fstab and comment out the line that mounts your swap partition)? If you don't want to reboot you...
  • D
    dgsnb reacted to gretz's post in the thread [SOLVED] How can I force swappiness=0 with Like Like.
    To make it persistent you need to add the following line to /etc/sysctl.conf : vm.swappiness=0
  • D
    dekiesel replied to the thread S3: Restore failing: "failed to extract file: failed to copy file contents: unexpected status code 504 Gateway Timeout".
    https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fehler-upload-chunk-to-s3-backend-upload-failed-unexpected-status-code-504-gateway-timeout.176833/ People here are having similar issues (as you probably remember) and somebody contacted Hetzner, but they only...
  • C
    ChrisTG74 reacted to dstachur's post in the thread Ethernet interface not coming up after installation of Proxmox with Like Like.
    You think so? I made a post in this topic because this may not be obvious how to configure Proxmox on this particular hardware and I wanted to make Abinsha sure that Proxmox works fine on HPE BL460 :-) Anyway Proxmox installer is one of the...
  • F
    ftzh75 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.1.1 dnsmasq issue.
    Yes It works and persistent thanks. The only downside is that each time I add a vnet, I have to do the same thing again, and also for the dhcpmasq service.
  • R
    richardm reacted to leesteken's post in the thread VM display freezes with QXL with Like Like.
    Thank you. Freezes started occurring when I changed my VMs from 128MiB for SPICE(qxl) to 64 MiB, in retrospect. After changing it back to the maximum of 128MiB the problem went away. The resolution is only 1280x1393 but it does appear to be...
  • W
    wire2hire replied to the thread Question about Feature Replication.
    Thanks for the clarification. I look forward to the next versions and will see where the journey takes us! Thank you and your team for really great software and support!
  • O
    Onslow reacted to maxiprox's post in the thread [SOLVED] Prune simulator OK but real prune KO :-( with Like Like.
    Good morning everyone, I’ve identified the issue: I changed the backup method from “unencrypted” to “encrypted.” Management approved the change and requested that all remaining “unencrypted” backups be removed. The former administrator carried...
  • I
    iwik replied to the thread LDAP Sync with nested Groups.
    Inspired by a forum solution for FreeIPA, I created patch for AD using AI Claude. Code is attached in this bug report.
  • D
    dekiesel reacted to Chris's post in the thread [SOLVED] Does verify "read" the whole data every time? with Like Like.
    Hi, to add some more context to the answer already provided by @a.bied-charreton especially relevant to avoid costs from data egress with S3: Verfication jobs are optimized to only verify chunks once, not re-verifying it for each backup snapshot...
  • Falk R.
    Falk R. replied to the thread Proxmox für 500-1000 VMs.
    Bitte nicht, wenn ihr eh schon vSAN nutzt, dann habt ihr doch schon alle Voraussetzungen für Ceph. Das harmoniert und skaliert viel besser als ein externes Storage. Derzeit kann das eingebaute CRS nur so viel wie DRS Teilautomatisiert. Es gibt...
  • F
    filozofd posted the thread Setting storage for VMS CCTV in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.
    Dear memebers, What would be the recommend settings for setup HDD storage for VM VMS CCTV on Windows 11 Pro? Is it fine to have Passthrough HDD directly to Windows and there to format NFTS with 90% of total memory? Also options in VM, I...
  • dcsapak
    dcsapak replied to the thread Tape Backup: understanding media sets.
    mhmm indeed it did not allocate a new media-set, this would look like this (what it did in my tests) 2026-02-18T10:39:19+01:00: Starting tape backup job '...' 2026-02-18T10:39:19+01:00: update media online status 2026-02-18T10:39:19+01:00...
  • M
    maxiprox replied to the thread [SOLVED] Prune simulator OK but real prune KO :-(.
    Good morning everyone, I’ve identified the issue: I changed the backup method from “unencrypted” to “encrypted.” Management approved the change and requested that all remaining “unencrypted” backups be removed. The former administrator carried...
  • A
    a.bied-charreton reacted to Chris's post in the thread [SOLVED] Does verify "read" the whole data every time? with Like Like.
    Hi, to add some more context to the answer already provided by @a.bied-charreton especially relevant to avoid costs from data egress with S3: Verfication jobs are optimized to only verify chunks once, not re-verifying it for each backup snapshot...
  • S
    Stefan123 replied to the thread Proxmox für 500-1000 VMs.
    Guten Morgen und vielen Dank für die umfangreichen Antworten. Grundsätzlich nutzen wir aktuell nur dei Hypervisor Lösungen, keinen Cloud Director. Das vSan würden wir wahrschenlich durch ein zentrales Storage ersetzen. Somit bleiben Funktionen...
  • W
    wire2hire replied to the thread Question about Feature Replication.
    ok so no continous cdr. but what are with "normal" replication, like restore from backup datasource to a pve node, first full , next incremental? like your zfs replication , where are the first full and then only the changes.
  • T
    take replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] Virtual Pendrive on VM.
    For those people who as me tried to do it inside a vm: do it in your hypervisor ;) On this step I was getting an error in VM's monitor on Proxmox 8.4.0: >Error: PCI: slot 31 function 0 already occupied by pci-bridge, new func nec-usb-xhci...
  • D
    dekiesel reacted to a.bied-charreton's post in the thread [SOLVED] Does verify "read" the whole data every time? with Like Like.
    Hey! When a verify job runs, all chunks are read, there is no skipping at the chunk level. When creating a verify job, you can enable "Skip Verified", which will skip already verified snapshots. Additionally, you may set "Re-Verify After" to...
  • A
    a.bied-charreton replied to the thread [SOLVED] Does verify "read" the whole data every time?.
    Hey! When a verify job runs, all chunks are read, there is no skipping at the chunk level. When creating a verify job, you can enable "Skip Verified", which will skip already verified snapshots. Additionally, you may set "Re-Verify After" to...
Show older items
Top Bottom
Back