Latest activity

  • J
    Johannes S reacted to Gilou's post in the thread Generic Compliance Questions with Like Like.
    I know you're not in France, because you missed HDS and SecNumCloud hahaha... Generally, as pointed out, assume this is a Linux system, and apply whatever recommendations that are required, but basically, there's is not much that Proxmox...
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to janus57's post in the thread Generic Compliance Questions with Like Like.
    Hi, Logical, since this is not for software or hardware; it's for compliance with how the enterprise manages their IT asset/security. Source : https://www.iso.org/standard/27001 Best regards,
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to Mike_Scholes's post in the thread Generic Compliance Questions with Like Like.
    Thanks gasherbrum Reading further that makes sense. I see companies advertising ISO 27001 using Proxmox so I have to assume it's the environment and implementation that's certified and not the products within.
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to gasherbrum's post in the thread Generic Compliance Questions with Like Like.
    Im assuming you are in a US govt adjacent area, just a couple tips for you as someone who used to work in that area most of these certs you are asking for apply to SaaS or otherwise a vendor storing sensitive data on your behalf. proxmox is not...
  • W
    waltar reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Recover broken Ceph config possible? with Like Like.
    well since the cluster is still up, not all is lost (or at least there is still a chance of recovery.) start with logging into a node containing a working monitor: ceph config dump | tee -a /etc/pve/ceph.conf.rebuild alternatively, if it doesnt...
  • A
    well since the cluster is still up, not all is lost (or at least there is still a chance of recovery.) start with logging into a node containing a working monitor: ceph config dump | tee -a /etc/pve/ceph.conf.rebuild alternatively, if it doesnt...
  • M
    Lately, when my Poxmox9.1.5 system boots (cold or warm,) networking fails. None of the CTs or VMs load because the vmbr is unavailable and the Proxmox host ends up on some random dhcp address as opposed the one assigned in...
  • G
    Gilou replied to the thread Generic Compliance Questions.
    I know you're not in France, because you missed HDS and SecNumCloud hahaha... Generally, as pointed out, assume this is a Linux system, and apply whatever recommendations that are required, but basically, there's is not much that Proxmox...
  • A
    alexskysilk replied to the thread PVE-root is full.
    https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/full-disk-on-vm-but-cant-find-files-taking-up-space.75084/post-336530
  • G
    gfngfn256 replied to the thread PVE-root is full.
    Thats probably going to be locally saved data meant for mounted USB/NFS that was unavailable/unmounted at the time.
  • Z
    ze42 replied to the thread evpn? network segmentation?.
    What are the best practice when you have completely separated networks, that need to get "out" of your proxmox cluster ? From what I understand, exit-nodes user "default" routes from the node itself, not dependent of the zone they come from...
  • news
    news reacted to Ernst T.'s post in the thread PVE-root is full with Like Like.
    Ein Anfang wäre auch: journalctl --vacuum-size=128M
  • A
    Awesome! This is the solution I (and probably the thread author) was looking for! Thank you very much for ignoring the drama and RTFM comments and providing a straight out solution.
  • D
    I performed a complete reinstallation of Proxmox last weekend, and it seems to have resolved the issue, as I haven’t experienced any additional crashes since then.
  • E
    Ernst T. replied to the thread PVE-root is full.
    Thanks for the information. I misinterpreted the missing value.
  • E
    Ernst T. reacted to Impact's post in the thread PVE-root is full with Like Like.
    https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/journald.conf.html#SystemMaxUse=
  • J
    janus57 replied to the thread Generic Compliance Questions.
    Hi, Logical, since this is not for software or hardware; it's for compliance with how the enterprise manages their IT asset/security. Source : https://www.iso.org/standard/27001 Best regards,
  • H
    hardl replied to the thread Local-LVM zu klein.
    Vielen Dank, das hat funktioniert, war aber mein Fehler, obwohl ich kopiert hatte.
  • M
    Thanks gasherbrum Reading further that makes sense. I see companies advertising ISO 27001 using Proxmox so I have to assume it's the environment and implementation that's certified and not the products within.
  • E
    Ernst T. replied to the thread PVE-root is full.
    There is no limit when installing with PVE Iso 9.0. I always change this (Mod-ET Block) first after installation. [Journal] # Mod-ET #Storage=volatile #Für log2RAM notwendig SystemMaxUse=64M MaxLevelStore=notice...