Latest activity
-
JHast Recht, die Volumegroup bleibt ja die von der OS Disk. Ich hätte das eh nicht so gebaut. Ich erstelle im Smart Array inner eine kleine vDisk für das OS und den Rest dann als große Disk für den Rest. Dann kann man da viel fexibler arbeiten...
-
JHi, lösche einfach den LVM-Thinpool auf deiner OS Disk, am besten gleich die Root Partition vergrößern: lvremove /dev/pve/data lvresize -l +100%FREE /dev/pve/root resize2fs /dev/mapper/pve-root Danach den anderen Thinpool löschen und mit dem...
-
JLVM-Thin eignet sich nicht als Shared Storage. Vielleicht funktioniert es, wenn du stattdessen LVM oder NFS nutzt. Wenn auf das LVM-Thin mehrere Hosts zugreifen, dann kann das Volume bei gleichzeitigem Zugriff nicht erweitert werden. Deshalb...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.As explained by ness1602 pve-zsync should cover your usecase,. It doesn't need a cluster but you will need to start the vms manually in case you need them: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/PVE-zsync And you will still need a regular backup
-
JJohannes S reacted to ness1602's post in the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime? with
Like.
You mention failover, and in that regard, it makes sense to use Proxmox <> Proxmox pve-zsync replication. Both proxmoxes have zfs storage for vm and cts and you implement it on one machine. Failove then has moving .conf files and starting the... -
JJohannes S reacted to ness1602's post in the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime? with Like.
You are literally speaking about snapshot replication, by zfs or any other FS. So just setup pve-zsync to another machine and it's done.
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime? with Like.
the relevant questions to ask: 1. Would you want the failover to occur automatically, or with user intervention? 2. What is an acceptable outage period? 3. What is acceptable in terms of minimum performance (specifically, disk performance) IF...
-
JJohannes S reacted to UdoB's post in the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime? with Like.
One very low-end approach, with these assumptions: you have two nearly identical PVE server, not clustered one is doing its job, the other is turned off you have sane PBS (with SSDs only, at least for the latest backup) - as you need to have...
-
JRome wasn't built in a day, it's probably far out yes. Just depends on the developers really.
-
Nness1602 replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.You mention failover, and in that regard, it makes sense to use Proxmox <> Proxmox pve-zsync replication. Both proxmoxes have zfs storage for vm and cts and you implement it on one machine. Failove then has moving .conf files and starting the...
-
44ge78f3ff posted the thread How to allow an external website to send emails on my behalf in Mail Gateway: Installation and configuration.Dear community, dear developers, I have to allow an external website to send emails on my behalf. This site (Typo3) can only reliably send emails via SMTP (authentication) port 587 – port 25 unfortunately doesn't work. Is this technically...
-
Tthomas0815 replied to the thread Verständinsproblem local-lvm.Hallo, wieder mal Danke für euren Input :) Betreffend ZFS - dazu habe ich mich schon belesen, man könnte ja die Disk direkt am Raid Controller durchreichen. (HBA Modus, bzw. Hybrid) Es scheint aber vorzukommen, dass einzelne Werte der Disk...
-
Cceghey replied to the thread [SOLVED] Anti-Cheat KVM Settings.yes run \StarCitizen\LIVE\EasyAntiCheat\EasyAntiCheat_Setup.exe [install, uninstall, factoryreset] ... run without args will show help uninstall will clean registry and delete EAC folder in %USERPROFILE%
-
BBren_Chester replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created new Linux bridge and now lost access to node.Something I just spotted now in the logs . Its showing the the bridge port is connected to the same interface so I would assume its causing a loop and not allowing access? Maybe?
-
-
shanreich replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created new Linux bridge and now lost access to node.Ah sorry I was confused since you mentioned 10.0.0.0/24 in the initial post You can always either try to reload the network configuration via ifreload -a . Alternatively you can use the ip command suite for changes to the running configuration... -
Ttahrens replied to the thread Simple concept for manual, short term use failover without significant downtime?.You mentioned VM / snapshot replication with "any other FS". As far as I know, that's only possible with local ZFS? Even ZFS over iSCSI doesn't work, if I'm correctly informed. Otherwise, I could use TrueNAS with ZFS over iSCSI and mount the VM...
-
CComfySofa replied to the thread Intel B50pro passthrough..Just to add to this (as ive still not got it working) - when the lspci command is used (and it displays the hardware plugged in) is this a hard connection to the hardware.... (just trying to work out why windows sees the card) - and the bios does...
-
BBren_Chester replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created new Linux bridge and now lost access to node.Hey Shanreich, The configuration for the subnet is with the slash 24 after the static IP : 192.168.0.206/24 .The 24 will give a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 so 254 hosts. This was always set like this, well until I couldn't access the web UI...
-
Mmanuhard posted the thread passthrough of a 8700G RADEON 780M in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi, I would like to passthrough my i780M GPU to my Windows 11 VM on Proxmox VE 9.1.4. My setup is the following: - CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (with integrated Radeon 780M iGPU) - Motherboard: ASUS TUF B850-M PLUS WIFI 7 (updated to the latest BIOS)...
-
Bbranpurn replied to the thread [SOLVED] Anti-Cheat KVM Settings.Thanks I had deleted the folder is there a command to run or registry keys to delete TBF didn't delete it every time I iterated either
