Latest activity

What's new Featured content New posts New profile posts Latest activity
  • F
    flames reacted to Impact's post in the thread Script for monitor ZFS Usage with Like Like.
    Why not follow what I told you above? There is no need to clone or recreate things.
  • C
    ch888 reacted to agross's post in the thread pve-container 6.1.0 startup for scratch container failed with Like Like.
    I too have issues with pve-container=6.1.0 related to host mounts. In my case, it is not related to NFS or read-only mounts. I wonder if this is the same issue or something else entirely. This issue is that the ownership of mp root directories...
  • F
    flames reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread ZFS 2.3.5 with Like Like.
    This is a good news, I'm especially interested in a new ZFS 2.4 feature which allows using the special device as zil/slog device: https://forums.truenas.com/t/using-a-special-vdev-no-slog-needed-anymore-maybe/59265/2...
  • T
    TechHome replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unmanaged LXC: Failed to receive the container state.
    # pveversion --verbose proxmox-ve: 9.1.0 (running kernel: 6.17.9-1-pve) pve-manager: 9.1.5 (running version: 9.1.5/80cf92a64bef6889) proxmox-kernel-helper: 9.0.4 proxmox-kernel-6.17.9-1-pve-signed: 6.17.9-1 proxmox-kernel-6.17: 6.17.9-1...
  • T
    TechHome posted the thread [SOLVED] Unmanaged LXC: Failed to receive the container state in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.
    Hi, after a recent update my unmanaged lxc does not start anymore. Logs: root@okapi:~# cat 108.log lxc-start 108 20260205135839.955 INFO confile - ../src/lxc/confile.c:set_config_idmaps:2295 - Read uid map: type u nsid 0 hostid 100000...
  • F
    flames reacted to UdoB's post in the thread ZFS 2.3.5 with Like Like.
    2.4 seems to be in non-sub now: Get:1 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve trixie/pve-no-subscription amd64 zfs-initramfs all 2.4.0-pve1 [26.3 kB] Get:2 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve trixie/pve-no-subscription amd64 libnvpair3linux...
  • F
    flames reacted to the_MiCrO's post in the thread ZFS 2.3.5 with Like Like.
    ZFS 2.4.0 would be a much better wait ;) Released 2 Weeks ago und many really nice improvements (rewrite -p, special vdev on raidz1/z2/..., faster encryption, better slow disk handling - to name my favs)
  • D
    Dexter23 replied to the thread Script for monitor ZFS Usage.
    Yes i try now with clone the vm disk become sparse.
  • H
    Hammer72 replied to the thread Migrate from Hyper-V to Proxmox VE 9.
    Thanks Steve, wasn't 100% sure which channel to use when asking the question originally.
  • UdoB
    UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread ZFS 2.3.5 with Like Like.
    Good idea, I would have to think about a kind of realistic scenario for comparing different setups though ;) Yes, I wouldn't do it right now either. But it's great news, that we won't have to wait until PVE10 to use the new feature ;)
  • dcsapak
    dcsapak reacted to shanreich's post in the thread Network migration fail with "failed to parse api response" in network selection with Like Like.
    You are missing some directives in the vmbr0_vlan100 and vmbr0_vlan48 sections respectively. When configuring an IPv4 address you need to add inet static - when configuring no IP address inet manual is required. Analogous for IPv6, but with inet6...
  • F
    flames replied to the thread Script for monitor ZFS Usage.
    Sparse (thin provisioning) won't affect already existing VM-disks, only newly created ones after you enabled that option. But you could clone existing VMs (and remove the previous), so the cloned VMs become sparse.
  • N
    NickyDoes replied to the thread Backup tool for standalone ZFS datasets to Proxmox Backup Server.
    I've already written what it does, and am not about to go on the full defensive. Reiterating succinctly: This is a wrapper for PBC. It adds inheritable backup config from within the dataset properties (vs. remembering to modify your PBC scripts)...
  • T
    thomas0815 posted the thread Verständinsproblem local-lvm in Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German).
    Hallo! Im Moment arbeitet ich mich gerade in Proxmox ein - und habe bereits einen Cluster gegründet. Die Testumgebung sieht wiefolgt aus: HP DL380 G9 mit SAS HDD im RAID5 Auf dem Raid 5 läuft direkt proxmox und die VMs liegen unter local-lvm...
  • J
    Johannes S replied to the thread ZFS 2.3.5.
    Good idea, I would have to think about a kind of realistic scenario for comparing different setups though ;) Yes, I wouldn't do it right now either. But it's great news, that we won't have to wait until PVE10 to use the new feature ;)
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to UdoB's post in the thread ZFS 2.3.5 with Like Like.
    You might produce something like "FABC: optimizing a pool by utilizing the new features of ZFS 2.4" or similar ;-) I would definitely read it :-) I hesitate to roll out that update (in my Homelab) though...
  • D
    Dexter23 replied to the thread Script for monitor ZFS Usage.
    I enable the thin provision but the space remain the same as before:
    • 1770300827118.png
    • 1770300853945.png
  • UdoB
    UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Cluster - Corosync - nur 1 nic - VLAN nutzen? with Like Like.
    Jein, standardmäß ist das VLAN nicht relevant (solange man nichts ändert), es wird für die Migration immer das gleiche Netzwerk genommen, wie corosync, was nicht ganz optimal ist (mehr dazu gleich). Nein, der Grund für die Empfehlung für...
  • UdoB
    UdoB replied to the thread ZFS 2.3.5.
    You might produce something like "FABC: optimizing a pool by utilizing the new features of ZFS 2.4" or similar ;-) I would definitely read it :-) I hesitate to roll out that update (in my Homelab) though...
  • M
    mfederanko replied to the thread EFI Disk Timeout during Boot.
    Thanks I'll look into it and get back to you.
Show older items
Top Bottom
Back