Latest activity
-
DDerekG replied to the thread [SOLVED] kernel: landlock - Error on VM boot - assistance required.Just a brief update on this TrueNAS VM issue. Today I decide to build a fresh TrueNAS VM with the host on kernel 6.17.4-1 and I am unable to get the VM to boot for installation, and with the passthrough devices attached the system would not...
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread [SOLVED] Two Nodes not in Cluster sharing same Subnet.Love to see people learn. Welcome abord! You want to write a /24 subnet as 10.172.10.0/24 because thats the network address, otherwise you're referencing a host-address. Bridge-Interfaces are commonly known and referenced as vmbr or br (but can... -
Ddarkorca posted the thread [SOLVED] Two Nodes not in Cluster sharing same Subnet in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello everyone, I will first start by saying I'm very new to Proxmox, my question is this and sorry if I use the wrong terminology for things up front. Is it possible to have a pve node on a bridge of lets say vrmb 3 with an subnet of...
-
Iivenae replied to the thread [SOLVED] Disable Outbound Filter.It's german mail provider GMX which sets this incredible large header. Solved.
-
Eshould be fixed in pve-manager 9.1.3
-
Ttherealivandrago replied to the thread Proxmox VLAN + Unifi - VMs don't get IP when VLAN tagged.Any ever get a fix? I'm having the same issue as the OP on my Unifi Gateway as well. Strangely I noticed that if I set port 2 for example to use Native VLAN set to "proxmox prod vlan" only the VMs are accessible and proxmox loses network...
-
GGlowsome reacted to maennlse's post in the thread Rocky 10 template and resolv.conf incomplete with
Like.
Hi, we face the same issue. and i can confirm the above mentioned workaround is working. (we currently apply it via a hook-script - i wonder if this just works by accident?) to me - the actual issue - looks like to be related to having multiple... -
Johannes S trifft es im Großen und Ganzen recht gut, hier nur noch ein paar eigene Worte dazu. Vorab eine wichtige Klarstellung. Wir haben nur eine Lizenz, und das ist die AGPLv3. Die Subscriptions bietet zusätzliche Services an, aber an der... -
Die Lizenz ist ja eh frei. Die Subscription bietet einen Mehrwert, wofür der Preis dann aufgerufen wird. Ich verstehe das Problem nicht mal eben OK zu klicken, das ist irgendwann auch im Musclememory und man merkt es gar nicht mehr. Wenn kein...
-
Ddeimosian replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unauthorized IP.Yes.
-
Ddeimosian replied to the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable).It appears this is not really true, unless you also segregate your community subscription PVE servers and clusters. Community subscriptions were advertised with enterprise repository access and denying it now is an abhorrent bait and switch...
-
Bblackline posted the thread Working SDN completely broke after applying a change in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi, we have 2 PVE clusters in prod mother cluster with 3 nodes worker cluster with 3 nodes They are more or less identical, have similar SDN configurations etc. Today we made an addition to the SDN configs on both clusters. The mother cluster...
-
Ddeimosian replied to the thread Message "No valid subscriptions".We had a meeting about this after realizing this limitation. Our CIO's take was essentially that Proxmox is now falsely advertising the Community Subscription since it clearly says it includes Enterprise Repository access. Managing all our...
-
DWe have a mix of Standard and Community licensed PVE based on criticality. Requiring Basic for enterprise repo access for PDM while PVE has enterprise repo access with a Community license is a bit idiosyncratic. I guess we're going to run with...
-
Ddeimosian replied to the thread Licensing Question.We had a meeting about this after realizing this limitation. Our CIO's take was essentially that Proxmox is now falsely advertising the Community Subscription since it clearly says it includes Enterprise Repository access. Managing all our...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread About memory difference.This is working as expected see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabc-why-is-proxmoxve-using-all-my-ram-and-why-cant-i-see-the-real-ram-usage-of-the-vms-in-the-dashboard.165943/ for details
-
WHi everyone, I've monitored some vm's resource. I saw a weird thing. That is a difference between vm's memory resource of proxmox gui and inside of vm process manager. This phenomenon still persists. Could anyone explain why this difference...
-
-
JJohannes S reacted to Kingneutron's post in the thread Making root volume live in the lvm thin pool ? with Like.
A) Proxmox is not really designed to work like that (rootfs in a thin pool) and B) you are likely to have issues when it's time to do a large dist-upgrade. C) Just because you can, does not mean you should. D) You are building a more fragile...
-
Hhuitheme replied to the thread Plugging in or unplugging the network cable will cause the PVE system to completely lose network connectivity..root@nuc:~# journalctl -k -b -1 | grep -Ei "i226|nic|link|reset|timeout" Dec 18 07:24:01 nuc kernel: NET: Registered PF_NETLINK/PF_ROUTE protocol family Dec 18 07:24:01 nuc kernel: audit: initializing netlink subsys (disabled) Dec 18 07:24:01 nuc...
-
Llisthor replied to the thread [SOLVED] Network failure after recent update.So, to cut a long story short, recent update doesn't like OVS or vice versa. I had applied aforementioned patch, didn't help; Removed bond0 from vmbr0 (ovs) and used physical interface, nothing Therefore I changed the entire config to linux...
