Latest activity
-
Falk R. reacted to Impact's post in the thread Kann in neuem CT kein Netzwerk-Storage als Disk2 auswählen with
Like.
Was du haben willst nennt sich Bind Mount und das ist nicht PVE Managed (werden auch nicht gesichert). Du musst diese manuell in der Konfiguration erstellen und dich um Berechtigungen kümmern. Ich empfehele das Anfängern nicht so sehr da recht... -
Falk R. replied to the thread Kann in neuem CT kein Netzwerk-Storage als Disk2 auswählen.Mit dem mounten im LXC bist du schon auf dem richtigen Weg, aber um ein NFS Share in einem LXC zu mounten, muss dieser privilegiert sein.
-
Ccfgmgr reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Multipath configuration to Pure storage array (VLANS) with Like.
having iscsi links separated is IDEAL, and works in most instances. iscsi over LACP can, AT BEST, match the performance of seperated links, but in practice this can be quite challenging. Storage vendors rarely have any control over the end user...
-
Falk R. replied to the thread Umwandeln weil Notlage RAM.Und wenn die neue zu langsam ist, liegt es oft nur an kleinen Einstellungen. Die default Settings sind bei PVE etwas konservativer als beim ESXi.
-
RRobRoye replied to the thread Move PBS backup to new 10G nic..For a copy that will be taken offsite, this is desired. A full backup taken offsite that is complete and can be used to recover everything in the event of disaster. I recommend having an offsite PBS server, but I also get that this isn't so easy...
-
Falk R. replied to the thread KMS installieren unter Proxmox.Wer hat dir denn so einen Unsinn erzählt? Wenn du Lizenzen gekauft hast, z.B. OEM oder Systembuilder, dann hast du eh nur MAK Keys und die gibst du brav deinen VMs und alles ist gut. Einen KMS brauchst du nur wenn die Server automatisch Lizenzen...
-
UdoB replied to the thread Welche m2 2280.https://geizhals.de/?cat=hdssd&xf=7139_>=480GB~7156_Power-Loss Protection Schlechte reale Auswahl... :-( Aber die Filtermöglichkeiten sind gut... MIt "M.2" Filter =... -
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread New Proxmox box w/ ZFS - R730xd w/ PERC H730 Mini in “HBA Mode” - BIG NO NO?.your disks have been wiped. this doesnt happen on its own.
-
JWo ist den jetzt der unterschied zwischen vmware und proxmox dabei? sind beides Hypervisor, die nichts mit Windows Aktivierung als solches zu tun haben. Kann mich aber täuschen….
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Multipath configuration to Pure storage array (VLANS).having iscsi links separated is IDEAL, and works in most instances. iscsi over LACP can, AT BEST, match the performance of seperated links, but in practice this can be quite challenging. Storage vendors rarely have any control over the end user...
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Question on PBS setup and hardware with Like.
We're looking at it from opposite perspectives. the word "prefer" tells the story; to facilitate high load, you will need to do this. The key remains that backup systems are essentially passive- all the work have to occur from the sender end; If...
-
JSeems so. One can build a backup system in any way - if it works (reliably, on the long run), it is probably fine :-)
-
Ffertig replied to the thread New Proxmox box w/ ZFS - R730xd w/ PERC H730 Mini in “HBA Mode” - BIG NO NO?.neither I filtered the last post (except the apt search) nor did I describe less than I did. On the contrary I logged all my steps exactly. The system is a newly installed proxmox cluster with CEPH. Yes I also have multipathed iscsi disks from...
-
G_gabriel reacted to RoCE-geek's post in the thread Redhat VirtIO developers would like to coordinate with Proxmox devs re: "[vioscsi] Reset to device ... system unresponsive" with Like.
But just the vioscsi (for SCSI) or viostor (for Block) INF downgrade is enough, there's no need for full virtio downgrade.
-
Falk R. replied to the thread MAM Attribute 800: Illegal Request.Was denn nun. Warnmeldungen oder Backup Abbruch? Warnungen kann man auch mal ignorieren, wenn man mit der Ursache klar kommt. Ein nicht funktionierendes Backup, bringt aber eine Errormeldung.
-
RRoCE-geek replied to the thread Redhat VirtIO developers would like to coordinate with Proxmox devs re: "[vioscsi] Reset to device ... system unresponsive".But just the vioscsi (for SCSI) or viostor (for Block) INF downgrade is enough, there's no need for full virtio downgrade.
-
RRobRoye replied to the thread Installation Question - VM vs dedicated hardware?.I have it installed as a VM in the cluster and it is working perfectly. Has no issues with ay host, remote or local.
-
UdoB replied to the thread proxmox update download 70kb.Try to use IPv4 instead, at least for troubleshooting to exclude IPv6 has problems: Run this on a root shell: apt -o Acquire::ForceIPv4=true update && apt -o Acquire::ForceIPv4=true -d -y full-upgrade
-
RRoCE-geek replied to the thread Redhat VirtIO developers would like to coordinate with Proxmox devs re: "[vioscsi] Reset to device ... system unresponsive".0.1.271 is last OK, 0.1.285+ is buggy.
-
Falk R. replied to the thread Fehler: upload chunk to s3 backend - upload failed: unexpected status code 504 Gateway Timeout.Wenn du requests limitierst, brauchst du keine Bandbreite limitieren.