This is just curiosity: why was chosen to use zfs instead of btrfs.
I'm getting familiar with both and, to me, it seems they do the same things.
So I wonder what are the specif reasons you chose zfs.
Was btrfs still consider unstable at the time of choice?
Was btrfs redundancy not ready?
Other reasons...
I'm getting familiar with both and, to me, it seems they do the same things.
So I wonder what are the specif reasons you chose zfs.
Was btrfs still consider unstable at the time of choice?
Was btrfs redundancy not ready?
Other reasons...
