I have ZFS Raidz1 pool using 5x800gb SAS SSD, one of the disk failed and I replaced it first with command
zpool replace sas-ssd 10890762950005935701 /dev/sdh
Which went fine, but then I realized its apparently not great idea to reference disk by /dev/sdX path if disk order changes? So I did zpool export sas-ssd and now replaced disk appeared referenced by id starting with wwn- while other disks are starting with scsi- , does this matter?
zpool replace sas-ssd 10890762950005935701 /dev/sdh
Which went fine, but then I realized its apparently not great idea to reference disk by /dev/sdX path if disk order changes? So I did zpool export sas-ssd and now replaced disk appeared referenced by id starting with wwn- while other disks are starting with scsi- , does this matter?
Code:
root@pve:~# zpool status
pool: sas-ssd
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 0B in 00:04:33 with 0 errors on Fri Nov 14 22:39:02 2025
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
sas-ssd ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
wwn-0x5002538a0772c6f0 ONLINE 0 0 0
scsi-3500117310199d710 ONLINE 0 0 0
scsi-3500117310199d66c ONLINE 0 0 0
scsi-3500117310199e464 ONLINE 0 0 0
scsi-3500117310199e368 ONLINE 0 0 0