Apologies if this has been asked numerous times already. I just want to get this straight before building out our Promox environment further.
Whats the difference between these two network configurations?
3.4.5. Routed Configuration
3.4.6. Masquerading (NAT) with iptables
They appear to provide the same outcome in that they route all trafic via the same interface or MAC address.
Are their any advanges/disadvantages from using one or the other?
I have a cluster setup with a vmbr0 network on all nodes using Masquerading (NAT with iptables) and it appears to functioning well. Looking at the /etc/network/interfaces config, they seem nearly identifcal except for the extra iptables NAT rules for Masquerading.
So basically doing the same thing but different configs only?
Thanks.
Whats the difference between these two network configurations?
3.4.5. Routed Configuration
3.4.6. Masquerading (NAT) with iptables
They appear to provide the same outcome in that they route all trafic via the same interface or MAC address.
Are their any advanges/disadvantages from using one or the other?
I have a cluster setup with a vmbr0 network on all nodes using Masquerading (NAT with iptables) and it appears to functioning well. Looking at the /etc/network/interfaces config, they seem nearly identifcal except for the extra iptables NAT rules for Masquerading.
So basically doing the same thing but different configs only?
Thanks.