Vzdump backups wrong node?

Erwin123

Member
May 14, 2008
207
1
16
Recently I upgraded two of our nodes to 1.8 with kernel 1.18.
I made a tenporarly new cluster of these two nodes.
Entered the backups (snapshot) information for both nodes trough the master.
Backups work, I see the naming convention is changed (btw. the hostname of the node in the name of the backup would be more helpfull then the date...)

For some weird reason I see this on the backupdisk on the master node:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 644 Jun 30 06:15 vzdump-140.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15G Jun 30 06:15 vzdump-140.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 868 Jul 30 00:34 vzdump-openvz-101-2011_07_30-00_30_04.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.4G Jul 30 00:33 vzdump-openvz-101-2011_07_30-00_30_04.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 868 Jul 30 00:37 vzdump-openvz-108-2011_07_30-00_34_01.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.3G Jul 30 00:37 vzdump-openvz-108-2011_07_30-00_34_01.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 870 Jul 30 02:10 vzdump-openvz-123-2011_07_30-00_37_15.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48G Jul 30 02:07 vzdump-openvz-123-2011_07_30-00_37_15.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 870 Jul 30 03:13 vzdump-openvz-124-2011_07_30-02_10_04.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30G Jul 30 03:10 vzdump-openvz-124-2011_07_30-02_10_04.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 870 Jul 30 04:53 vzdump-openvz-125-2011_07_30-03_13_04.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48G Jul 30 04:51 vzdump-openvz-125-2011_07_30-03_13_04.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 869 Jul 30 05:10 vzdump-openvz-127-2011_07_30-04_53_48.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.7G Jul 30 05:09 vzdump-openvz-127-2011_07_30-04_53_48.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 869 Jul 30 05:12 vzdump-openvz-128-2011_07_30-05_10_11.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2G Jul 30 05:12 vzdump-openvz-128-2011_07_30-05_10_11.tar

So its making one backup with the old naming..
Whats weirder, that container is not even on this specific node!
Its on the second node where it is also backupped (with the right name).

Now the container ones lived on the node that now mysteriously backs it up from the other node.
I hope there's a rational explenation for this?

Thanks!