The 2 servers of the cluster randomly reboot without logs

S

sebastien@domalys

Member
Feb 24, 2020
6
0
6
47
Hello all,

We currently have a proxmox cluster with 2 servers (in different provider and different city) and another server, in our company, with NFS share (for backup) and qdevice.

Code: 
(A) Proxmox Server A (Provider One) ---------------------- (B) Proxmox Server B (Provider Two)
                 |                                                          |
                 \----------------------------------------------------------/
                                               |
                  (C) Qdevice on Debian server (in the company) + NFS share

Saturday, the two servers have reboot with one hour of difference without logs.

The proxmox servers have the same version with latest updates (6.4-13).

We use only ZFS file system. The server A is a intel server and the server B is a amd server.

Here is the kernel logs of the reboot of the server A :

...
Nov 14 00:42:45 ns399886 kernel: [394026.624237] perf: interrupt took too long (4924 > 4900), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_ra
te to 40500
Nov 16 08:56:53 ns399886 kernel: [596475.328665] zd64: p1 p2 < p5 >
Nov 18 04:54:22 ns399886 kernel: [754724.101735] watchdog: watchdog0: watchdog did not stop!
Nov 18 04:55:52 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.143-1-pve (build@proxmox) (gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)) #1 SMP PVE 5.4.143-1 (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:10:37 +0200) ()
Nov 18 04:55:52 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/ROOT/pve-1@/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.143-1-pve root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 ro root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs rootdelay=10 vga=normal nomodeset rootdelay=15 noquiet nosplash
....

And 2 days later ...

Nov 20 15:50:26 ns399886 kernel: [ 180.022100] fwbr101i0: port 2(tap101i0) entered disabled state
Nov 20 15:50:26 ns399886 kernel: [ 180.022196] fwbr101i0: port 2(tap101i0) entered blocking state
Nov 20 15:50:26 ns399886 kernel: [ 180.022226] fwbr101i0: port 2(tap101i0) entered forwarding state
Nov 20 17:42:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.143-1-pve (build@proxmox) (gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)) #1 SM
P PVE 5.4.143-1 (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:10:37 +0200) ()
Nov 20 17:42:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/ROOT/pve-1@/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.143-1-pve root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/p
ve-1 ro root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs rootdelay=10 vga=normal nomodeset rootdelay=15 noquiet nosplash
Nov 20 17:42:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
Nov 20 17:42:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel



Here is the kernel logs of the reboot of the server B :

Nov 15 17:11:41 server-hetzner kernel: [536283.455709] fwbr102i0: port 2(tap102i0) entered blocking state
Nov 15 17:11:41 server-hetzner kernel: [536283.455709] fwbr102i0: port 2(tap102i0) entered forwarding state
Nov 20 16:47:44 server-hetzner kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.143-1-pve (build@proxmox) (gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6))
#1 SMP PVE 5.4.143-1 (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:10:37 +0200) ()
Nov 20 16:47:44 server-hetzner kernel: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.4.143-1-pve root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 ro roo
t=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs quiet


Do you have a idea of these reboot ? Currently, the reboot is almost one reboot per week.

I installed the intel-microcode package for the server A and amd64-microcode for the server B. It seems no currently change (in the kernel log, the microcode version don't rise). Also, I installed the kdump package. I wait the next reboot.

Meanwhile, do you have a idea of the origin of the crash/reboot ?

Best regards.
 
Last edited:
The server rebooted twenty minutes ago :

Here is the kernel logs of the reboot of the server A :

Nov 21 05:20:30 ns399886 kernel: [41931.019689] perf: interrupt took too long (3133 > 3131), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 63750
Nov 21 13:18:34 ns399886 kernel: [70615.117951] perf: interrupt took too long (3918 > 3916), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 51000
Nov 22 13:06:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0x21, date = 2019-02-13
Nov 22 13:06:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.143-1-pve (build@proxmox) (gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)) #1 SMP PVE 5.4.143-1 (Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:10:37 +0200) ()
Nov 22 13:06:19 ns399886 kernel: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/ROOT/pve-1@/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.143-1-pve root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/p
ve-1 ro root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/pve-1 boot=zfs rootdelay=10 vga=normal nomodeset rootdelay=15 noquiet nosplash

As kdump were just installed, the kdump not started.
 
sebastien@domalys said:
We currently have a proxmox cluster with 2 servers (in different provider and different city)
Click to expand...
How far apart are they? ping-wise, of course.

As far as I know a cluster requires a stable connection for corosync with a low latency of a few milliseconds maximum. (I believe I've read 2 ms.)

I am unsure if this a problem only if "HA" is activated though. Did you activate High-Availability?

But basically: if the reply from the other cluster members takes too long a node will consider itself having lost connection. Then fencing occurs. Fencing results in rebooting...

See also https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#ha_manager_fencing

Best regards
 
Thanks a lot UdoB for your explanation ! It makes sense.

Yes, The HA functionality is activated.

Effectively, each server is located in different country :
- Server A : North of France
- Server B : Sweden
- Qdevice C : South of France

As the nodes don't share the same space hard disk (we synchronize each hard disk of each virtual machine, between node, every 5 minutes by ZFS system), how rise the delay before a server fence itself in our cluster ?

Effectively, we don't need a protection of millisecond, just that a virtual machine start on another node if a the original node don't answer during 1 minute (for example).

Currently :

The ping between server A and B is a average of 35 ms.
The ping between server A and C is a average of 15 ms.
The ping between server B and C is a average of 47 ms.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards.
 
Last edited:
Hello at all !

Since your message UdoB, I removed all servers in HA group.

Since these modification, 5 days, there is no reset.

Unfortunely, I need a kind of avaibility of each virtual machine, but no High Avaibility. If a virtual server don't work respond, I would that the second server start the same virtual machine in 5 minutes after the outage. But without reset de Host.

Do you know a way to do that ?

I already set a sync, every 5 minutes, between the servers, now I need to create a avaibility functionality but high latence (in second). The same thing as corosync but where i can set the timeout between the servers.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom