Hi there,
i have a serious problem with my root server, according to my ISP (Serverhoster) my Server (MAC) responds ARP-Requests, claiming to possess foreign ip-adresses (in the same subnet).
Actually i have no idea why it does so, all ip configurations are static.
i also have some openct vms running with vmbr0 as well as veth0(just "set" an ip adress)
afaik, the veth0 is bridging the eth0 interface so its possible for VMs to claim foreign ip adresses, but my ip configurations are static and i never set foreign adresses since i'm using a private subnet like 192.168.x.y, combined with NAT/MASQUERADE via iptables.
can NAT/MASQUERADE result in overtaking ip-addresses?
my hoster cut understandably the network connection so i can only perform "dry" debugging via vnc/kvm, is there a way to virtually turn eth0 so i can analyze the network traffic?
greetings and thank you for helping
i have a serious problem with my root server, according to my ISP (Serverhoster) my Server (MAC) responds ARP-Requests, claiming to possess foreign ip-adresses (in the same subnet).
Actually i have no idea why it does so, all ip configurations are static.
i also have some openct vms running with vmbr0 as well as veth0(just "set" an ip adress)
afaik, the veth0 is bridging the eth0 interface so its possible for VMs to claim foreign ip adresses, but my ip configurations are static and i never set foreign adresses since i'm using a private subnet like 192.168.x.y, combined with NAT/MASQUERADE via iptables.
can NAT/MASQUERADE result in overtaking ip-addresses?
my hoster cut understandably the network connection so i can only perform "dry" debugging via vnc/kvm, is there a way to virtually turn eth0 so i can analyze the network traffic?
greetings and thank you for helping