link points to this advice
"Error is showing up because your OS doesn’t trust someone who signed the certificate that the website is signed with.You can add –no-check-certificate but this is not necessarily what you wan’t to do as this is just cheating on your OS.Verify who signed your website and if you really trust it or not."
I'm not sure, I'll try tomorrow, but I can get the ticked using the same method
Code:
wget --no-check-certificate
"--no-check-certificate’Don't check the server certificate against the available certificate authorities. Also don't require the URL host name to match the common name presented by the certificate. As of Wget 1.10, the default is to verify the server's certificate against the recognized certificate authorities, breaking the SSL handshake and aborting the download if the verification fails. Although this provides more secure downloads, it does break interoperability with some sites that worked with previous Wget versions, particularly those using self-signed, expired, or otherwise invalid certificates. This option forces an “insecure” mode of operation that turns the certificate verification errors into warnings and allows you to proceed.
If you encounter “certificate verification” errors or ones saying that “common name doesn't match requested host name”, you can use this option to bypass the verification and proceed with the download.
Only use this option if you are otherwise convinced of the site's authenticity, or if you really don't care about the validity of its certificate. It is almost always a bad idea not to check the certificates when transmitting confidential or important data. "
which I guess is like this curl option (I may be wrong) in spirit's script.
"-k, --insecure (SSL) This option explicitly allows curl to perform "insecure" SSL connections and transfers. All SSL connections are attempted to be made secure by using the CA certificate bundle installed by default. This makes all connections considered "insecure" fail unless
-k, --insecure is used. "
perhaps should I add some "Set-Cookie" string at cookie start? I never did stuff like this...
I'll try more tomorrow...
Marco