Just throwing this out there to see if anyone has experienced anything similar.
Under Nautilus, our Windows VMs were able to do about 1.5 GB/sec sequential read, and 1.0 GB/sec sequential write.
Under Nautilus, our rados bench was showing us 2.0 GB/s sequential read and write, and this was sustainable no matter how long I ran the test. The difference in Windows versus rados bench performance always struck me odd but nothing came of it.
After upgrading to Octopus, our rados bench numbers are about the same, but Windows sequential performance has dropped to about 900 MB/sec on read and 400 MB/sec on writes.
Are there new tunables relating to the RBD client? What should I be looking for?
Thanks for any hints or anecdotes
Under Nautilus, our Windows VMs were able to do about 1.5 GB/sec sequential read, and 1.0 GB/sec sequential write.
Under Nautilus, our rados bench was showing us 2.0 GB/s sequential read and write, and this was sustainable no matter how long I ran the test. The difference in Windows versus rados bench performance always struck me odd but nothing came of it.
After upgrading to Octopus, our rados bench numbers are about the same, but Windows sequential performance has dropped to about 900 MB/sec on read and 400 MB/sec on writes.
Are there new tunables relating to the RBD client? What should I be looking for?
Thanks for any hints or anecdotes