I am testing proxmox and have two kvm ubuntu vm's. However I can't access network from one of the vm's.
Both are pretty much identical, only IP is different.
I have bridge group vmbr0, connected to eth0, tap100i0 and tap101i0.
VM connected to tap100i0 is working, tap101i0 is not.
brctl showmacs - shows vm mac-addresses in correct ports.
But I can't get ARP reply through from VM1. I can tcpdump, that VM1 transmits arp-query for default gw through tap101i0. I can also see that same packet going out in eth0 and reply being generated okey. But the reply goes to tap100i0, not to source tap101i0. So trafic coming from tap101i0(bridge port #3) goes back to tap100i0(bridge port #2).
Tried to google, but didn't find anything about this. What I am missing here? :O
Both are pretty much identical, only IP is different.
I have bridge group vmbr0, connected to eth0, tap100i0 and tap101i0.
VM connected to tap100i0 is working, tap101i0 is not.
Code:
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
vmbr0 8000.08606e695747 no eth0
tap100i0
tap101i0brctl showmacs - shows vm mac-addresses in correct ports.
Code:
port no mac addr is local? ageing timer
3 < VM1 MAC > no 0.71
1 < GATEWAY MAC > no 0.00
2 < VM0 MAC > no 0.22
1 08:60:6e:69:57:47 yes 0.00
1 10:0d:7f:57:89:42 no 2.21
3 1e:7a:7b:ce:42:5e yes 0.00
2 9a:e8:4f:d2:82:3f yes 0.00But I can't get ARP reply through from VM1. I can tcpdump, that VM1 transmits arp-query for default gw through tap101i0. I can also see that same packet going out in eth0 and reply being generated okey. But the reply goes to tap100i0, not to source tap101i0. So trafic coming from tap101i0(bridge port #3) goes back to tap100i0(bridge port #2).
Tried to google, but didn't find anything about this. What I am missing here? :O