[SOLVED] it's possible too synchronize datastores in the same pbs?

[metaenlace]

Hello, (sorry my english) have a question about synchronization:
it's possible to synchronize between two datastores located in the same pbs? one datastore is local zfs pool and the other is a remote nfs resource.
Actually i have two pbs's one whit local datastore and other whit nfs datastore. The first have push synchronize jobs to the second. My plan is to have only one pbs whit two datastores, the local and the nfs, and remove the second pbs. Other better ideas?
thank you in advance.

 

[mkoeppl]

Hello! If I understand your intent correctly, you want to have both datastores on the same PBS and synchronize between them. You should be able to do that by adding the local datastore as a remote and then creating a sync job for that remote. I suppose you've already configured this before, but in any case this should help you.

 

[metaenlace]

Hello! If I understand your intent correctly, you want to have both datastores on the same PBS and synchronize between them. You should be able to do that by adding the local datastore as a remote and then creating a sync job for that remote. I suppose you've already configured this before, but in any case this should help you.

Thank you very much! I didn't imagine I could configure the same PBS as a remote. It's working perfectly.

 

[wbk]

adding the local datastore as a remote and then creating a sync job for that remote

I know the thread has been solved, but for future reference, for use cases as those of @metaenlace, there is a less convoluted way.

Datastores themselves have sync jobs as well. The "pull" type allows syncing local storage:



The result is the same of course, but without the need of adding and configuring a remote.

 

[metaenlace]

I know the thread has been solved, but for future reference, for use cases as those of @metaenlace, there is a less convoluted way.

Datastores themselves have sync jobs as well. The "pull" type allows syncing local storage:

View attachment 87594

The result is the same of course, but without the need of adding and configuring a remote.

Thank you very much, I will try this way.