Hiya!
I have spent years working with Windows and I'm new to Proxmox, althought I have some experience with Linux running in Virtualbox on Windows.
In Windows, the C drive is the system drive, so it makes sense for this to be as fast as possible - hence the use of NVMe M.2 storage for OS and application things, with HDD/SSDs for data storage. When running Linux in Virtualbox, the VM system files would also be saved to the local NVMe drive, and you could access the data drives as SMB shares and mount them in Linux.
This doesn't seem to work the same way in Proxmox. Proxmox has been installed onto the NVMe drive, but when I go to create VMs, it wants to store those VM files on the slower HDDs (which are running as a mirrored ZFS pool). Is this best practice? I had ordered a new (larger) NVMe drive thinking that I'd need extra storage to store the VM system files, but if they're going to be stored in the ZFS pool, maybe the existing 128GB NVMe will be sufficient.
Thanks!
K
I have spent years working with Windows and I'm new to Proxmox, althought I have some experience with Linux running in Virtualbox on Windows.
In Windows, the C drive is the system drive, so it makes sense for this to be as fast as possible - hence the use of NVMe M.2 storage for OS and application things, with HDD/SSDs for data storage. When running Linux in Virtualbox, the VM system files would also be saved to the local NVMe drive, and you could access the data drives as SMB shares and mount them in Linux.
This doesn't seem to work the same way in Proxmox. Proxmox has been installed onto the NVMe drive, but when I go to create VMs, it wants to store those VM files on the slower HDDs (which are running as a mirrored ZFS pool). Is this best practice? I had ordered a new (larger) NVMe drive thinking that I'd need extra storage to store the VM system files, but if they're going to be stored in the ZFS pool, maybe the existing 128GB NVMe will be sufficient.
Thanks!
K