Hi.
I have the following network config, where vlan 250-251 are for storage, and 254 is for migration. Would it be ok to set the vlan-raw-device to enp65s0f0 for vlan 250 and enp65s0f1 for vlan251, in order to use both network cards for storage, or are there any disadvantages?
I have the following network config, where vlan 250-251 are for storage, and 254 is for migration. Would it be ok to set the vlan-raw-device to enp65s0f0 for vlan 250 and enp65s0f1 for vlan251, in order to use both network cards for storage, or are there any disadvantages?
auto enp65s0f0iface enp65s0f0 inet manualauto enp65s0f1iface enp65s0f1 inet manualauto bond0iface bond0 inet manual bond-slaves enp65s0f0 enp65s0f1 bond-miimon 100 bond-mode active-backup bond-primary enp65s0f0auto vmbr1iface vmbr1 inet manual bridge-ports bond0 bridge-stp off bridge-fd 0 bridge-vlan-aware yes bridge-vids 2-4094auto vlan250iface vlan250 inet static address 10.0.0.108/24 vlan-raw-device vmbr1auto vlan251iface vlan251 inet static address 10.1.10.108/24 vlan-raw-device vmbr1auto vlan254iface vlan254 inet static address 10.2.10.108/24 vlan-raw-device vmbr1auto vlan1055iface vlan1055 inet static address 10.3.10.108/24 gateway 10.3.10.0 vlan-raw-device vmbr1
Last edited: