After adding a subscription key, which are se correct reopsitories?

A

Astralix

Member
Proxmox Subscriber
Jan 18, 2025
49
6
8
Austria
I have decided to keep the Proxmox system I was tinkering with and bought the license. Proper work deserves proper money.
However, in the beginning I read about adding this and that to get updates but not the annoying "Buy a license" pop-up.
My repository setup now looks like this:
1757860146717.png

I cannot add the ceph-quincy repositories as they seem not to exist. And I think I can get rid of the tinkered in stuff?
But I am not sure which forum article I followed to set that stuff up.

Can somebody list me the right repositories? I am running Proxmox 9.0.9, updated from an older revision a few weeks ago.

Thanks!
Astralix
 
It's not a license but a support subscription, those are legally completely different things (in English). Thank you for supporting Proxmox.

You are mixing the older .list format for repositories and the newer .sources format for repositories. Maybe remove the mess of duplicated repositories in different formats (from disk using the command line) and then only add the Debian repositories, the Proxmox VE and Ceph enterprise repositories via the Add button? Or add them via the command line: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysadmin_package_repositories (Ceph is here: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysadmin_package_repositories_ceph ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astralix and Johannes S
I don't understand by you used the test repository for Ceph instead of the enterprise Ceph repository. Luckily it is disabled but you should use (and enable) the same "type" of repository for Ceph as you do for Proxmox.
You still have the Debian repositories duplicated (in debian.sources and sources.list; maybe remove the latter?)!
Why the pve-test repository? Although it is disable and can therefore not cause problems.
 
Ups! Thanks for the ceph mistake. I must have slipped when copying the repository data to the .sources files.
Yes, the Debian is still a bit confused as the update to Trixie left some .list files in other directories. The plain Debian repositories from your FAQ link differ in acquired repositories from the original /etc/apt/sources.list file in Debian. And I was sure that I removed duplicates, so I'll check again tonight.
 
Last check?
I cleaned up the debian.sources and added the pve-no-subscription and pve-test just for completeness.
Normally I would avoid pictures, but this is sort of easy to compare for other people with the same question, hopefully.
1757950767991.png
 
Will this be the final picture?

I was wondering why the deb-src were added as they are in the FAQs? I removed them for now. As all the files are cleaned up, such things can be added again very easy.
1757952151589.png
 

Attachments

  • 1757952207559.png
    1757952207559.png
    195.7 KB · Views: 1
Yeah I saw but I have never added other repositores myself, might be a leftover since earlier versions?
I checked and i have:

contrib/libs libnvpair3linux
contrib/libs libuutil3linux
contrib/libs libzfs6linux
contrib/libs libzpool6linux
contrib/metapackages spl
contrib/kernel zfs-initramfs
contrib/admin zfs-zed
contrib/admin zfsutils-linux

Installed from contrib, and the zfs stuff seems good to have.. Are they available in proxmox repo maybe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom